B for sure. style is different for each author and influences potentially anything in the text. Think about shakespeare, he would obviously write differently to someone writing about teenage vampire romance.
Answer:
The irony is in the fact that both the lion and the tiger end up doing exactly the opposite of what they intended.
Explanation:
Hi. From the context of your question, we can see that you are referring to “The Cowardly Lion and Hungry Tiger,” which was written by L. Frank Baum. In this story we meet a lion who leaves its habitat determined to tear apart the first person it meets. In the same story, we see a tiger, which leaves its habitat determined to eat the first human baby it targets in front of it. The ironic thing is that when they find what they want they do completely different things.
The lion finds a woman lying on the ground and instead of tearing her to pieces, it lifts the woman and takes her home very gently and safely. The tiger, upon finding a baby on the ground, does not devour the baby, but takes it very gently to its mother, who is the woman the lion helped.
Answer:
Cluadius is Hamlet's uncle. Claudius marries his mother after funeral.
Explanation:
Answer:
D). Despite massive federal subsidies to public transportation systems and major local efforts to persuade.
Explanation:
As per the question, option D most appropriately revises the underlined part of the sentence('In spite....persuade') as <u>it is syntactically and semantically coherent. It precisely follows parallelism(plural form in 'federal subsidies..transportation systems and local efforts') that gives a clear and comprehensive meaning</u>. The other options are incorrect as they either contain parallelism error(inappropriate use of 'subsidizing' in option A) or unnecessarily uses the verb form('at persuading' in option B and 'making' in option C). Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.