The 1973 oil crisis began in October 1973 when the members of the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries proclaimed an oil embargo. The embargo was targeted at nations perceived as supporting Israel during the Yom Kippur War.[1] The initial nations targeted were Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States with the embargo also later extended to Portugal, Rhodesia and South Africa. By the end of the embargo in March 1974,[2] the price of oil had risen from US$3 per barrel to nearly $12 globally; US prices were significantly higher. The embargo caused an oil crisis, or "shock", with many short- and long-term effects on global politics and the global economy.[3] It was later called the "first oil shock", followed by the 1979 oil crisis, termed the "second oil shock."
Answer:
There are usually multiple methods for organizing items and information in a scienfic investigation.
Explanation:
Everyone has a different way of thinking, and therefore a different way of recording and organizing things for an investigation. This can come in the form of many ways:
- A different chart.
- A different order of experiments (though the same process and equipment for each)
- A pie chart instead of a bar graph.
However, two investigations that are completely different can have a similar way of recording and organizing data:
- Same chart type.
- Same graph type.
There are HUNDREDS of ways to map out an investigation- if there weren't more than one way, I can bet there would be thousands of scienfic discoveries that wouldn't have happened!
<u>"Routing protocol spoofing
"</u> can be used to falsify routing information, cause DoS attacks, or cause traffic to be redirected.
A routing protocol indicates how switches speak with one another, conveying data that empowers them to choose courses between any two hubs on a PC arrange. Steering calculations decide the particular decision of course. Every router has an earlier learning just of systems joined to it specifically. A routing protocol shares this data first among quick neighbors, and after that all through the system. Along these lines, routers gain information of the topology of the system.
Answer:
the marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost
Explanation:
In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the government decided to allocate more resources toward defense goods. The government's decision reflects their assessment that t<u>he marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost.</u>
In utility in economics, once the marginal benefits of buying an item outweighs the marginal cost of the item, you buy it. After the September 11, 2001 attack, the United States government found a need to increase the defense budget to prevent further attack. It can be concluded that the marginal benefit derived from increased defense spending outweighs the cost.
