Do you believe that violence is sometimes necessary to achieve a political goal/objective? Explain your answer.

1 answer:

ozzi2 years ago

6 0

Absolutely not because your creating an image about yourselves that most be wouldn’t agree with. Saying that the whole blm riots destroyed government property, small businesses and much more. Most people had no hate towards that and saw it as a positive way of doing what’s right. Now leaning to republicans storming the capital everybody saw that as a hate crime but ignored the fact the blm protests did the same thing. It’s all about perspective and how others view it but in my opinion, violence is never necessary and should never be looked at as a last resort.

You might be interested in

Explain why roosevelt acted on the principle the enemy of my enemy is my friend and why churchill believed that if hitler invade

siniylev [52]

Explanation:

Roosevelt felt that despite Russia being communist, Hitler posed a more immediate threat, and that before they get at each other, Hitler had to be knocked down. Churchill believed that Hitler would do anything to get what he wants, albeit killing millions or sell his soul to the devil himself. Hitlee also openly voiced his idea of fascism everywhere, which didnt exactly comfort churchill

8 0

2 years ago

What is the best reason for the puritans spirit of community

zepelin [54]

<span>A strong sense of community was required from the church-controlled government.</span>

7 0

2 years ago

Which two human activities are known to be the greatest contributes to global warming

love history [14]

Answer:

Fossil fuels and carbon tracing.

Explanation: