Answer:
Explanation:
United States is producing 200 tons of hamburgers and 60 tons of tacos.
United States' opportunity cost for producing 1 ton of hamburgers
= 
= 0.3
United States' opportunity cost for producing 60 tons of tacos.
= 
= 3.33
So we see that US has a lower opportunity cost in producing hamburgers, so it has a comparative advantage in producing hamburgers.
Mexico is producing 40 tons of hamburgers and 50 tons of tacos.
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of hamburgers
= 
= 1.25
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of tacos
= 
= 0.8
So we see that Mexico has a lower opportunity cost in producing tacos, so it has a comparative advantage in making tacos.
Since US specializes in making hamburgers, it will produce 200 tons of hamburgers and 0 tons of tacos.
Mexico specializes in making tacos, it will produce 50 tons of tacos and 0 tons of hamburgers.
Answer:
people care more about their own surplus than they do about total surplus.
Explanation:
Price control can either be a price ceiling or a price floor.
A price ceiling is when the government or an agency of the government sets the maximum price for a good or service. It is usually set below equilibrium price.
Price ceiling increase consumer surplus and reduce producer surplus.
A price floor is when the government or an agency of the government sets the least price a good or service can be sold. It is usually set above equilibrium price.
Price floor increases producer surplus and reduces consumer surplus.
Producers would be advocating for a price floor because it increases their surplus, while, consumers would advocate for a price ceiling.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the product.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a product and the least price the seller is willing to sell the product.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The correct answer is normative analysis.
Explanation:
A positive analysis is the one that attempts to reflect reality with statements of cause and effect and is used mainly in microeconomics. On the other hand, a normative analysis, in which reality is prescribed, that is, we go beyond explanation and prediction, value judgments are used.
In contrast to the positive analysis, the normative analysis responds how the law should achieve efficiency objectives. This analysis assumes that efficiency is an objective that law should reflect and that legal norms should change when they fail. From this perspective, efficiency is a social value that the Law should promote.
Answer:
give ur mom the corona and then u cant stay in the house because anything could be infected
or just annoy her so much that she kicks u out
Explanation:
