Answer:
Set benchmarks and track progress. ...
Build in time for student self-reflection. ...
Keep an open mind and avoid assumptions. ...
Develop relationships with parents. ...
Introduce texts and topics that are culturally relevant. ...
Personalize learning.
Explanation:
The principle of stare decisis, which involves precedent, obliges other courts to apply the law consistently in the same circumstances.
When a case involves the same or similar facts or the same legal issues, a judicial decision known as a precedent is used as a guide. At common law, courts must follow the precedents of other courts. Courts must follow certain precedents but not others.
Determining which decisions apply to a particular court can be difficult due to the complexity of the federal structure. Priority is usually based on several decisions. Sometimes a single decision can set a precedent. For example, a state supreme court's interpretation of an individual statute is usually considered part of the law at the outset.
Learn about precedents:
brainly.com/question/6196271
#SPJ4
Answer:
False hope this helps pls mark brainliest
Answer:
Exclusionary Rule.
Explanation:
The exclusionary rule is a legal rule of the constitution that prevents any illegal search and seizure of 'evidence' that is collected in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. It also prevents the presentation of such 'evidence' in a court of law.
This rule also states that any evidence collected in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) may not be admissible in a court of law as legal evidence as it is 'seized' in violation of the person's constitutional rights. The Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution prevents the government from doing any search or seizure of 'evidence' of a person's home without due reasonable reason. Thus, it prevents a person's from being forcefully searched. So, when such searches are done and evidence produced before the court, they are not admissible under the exclusionary rule.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
D, because if the faulty product is hazardous and can cause problems for the comsumer/customer; then it makes sense to file a lawsuit.
For example if the product has fake advertisment, or mis-leasding lables or a high level of harmful material.
(But you can be a Karen and post a review, that works too)
