I am sorry to say you that I don't have any information on this question. You can use chrome for answer
Answer:
The image is of a side profile of a woman's head, mounted on a cubed-base. She appears to be leaning, or perhaps falling. Although the woman is obviously plastic, the apathy and surrender in her face is supported by the statement, which written vertically down the left-hand side of the picture. The eye natural goes to the woman's eye, and then tends to drift up towards the word and the top and then down the statement, which gives the piece balance along with the use of shades and shadows creating unity.
Explanation:
Number one is C (Adagio, moderato, allegro). Number 2 is that it starts on an upbeat.
What is the theme ? Does the teacher want a theme?
Answer: No, it wouldn’t be a work of art.
Explanation: It wouldn’t be a work of Art because the artistic value is lost since the art loses its subjectivity. When the Artist work was allowed to hang in a public space, it had boundaries and was defined by no rules. It was a beautiful fusion of art and design viewed by all. Design and Art is objective; it’s primary function is to express the imagination in non grammatical ways. Those ways are determined by the artists and those that view it.
If this piece of work belonged to a corporation, it would lose its power of reflection and instead the corporation it belonged to would be in charge of allowing the art piece to reflect or convey a new form of visual rhetoric. This new framework would allow the corporation to communicate their own message, idea, or point of view. Which no longer makes it subjective.
