Answer:
D) Facilitative
Explanation:
Facilitative style: In management, the term "facilitative decision-making style" is described as one of the different decision making styles that indicates a specific joint effort between subordinates and leaders and they are both are providing an input in order to make a "shared decision". Along with this, they also possess some degree or extent of expertise or/and motivation that is responsible for ensuring an effective decision is being made.
In the question above, the given statement represents a facilitative decision-making style.
Answer:
a) unemployment rate = 15
b) unemployment rate = 2.5
Explanation:
unemployed people are those who are willing and available to work and have actively been seeking a job in the past four weeks. This accurately describes the 12 people who are willing, able and looking for work but cannot find jobs. To calculate the unemployment rate in percentage, the following formula is used:

Where:
a) Number of unemployed = 12
Labour force = 80 (number of people over 16 years of age)

b) if 10 of the unemployed people get discouraged and give up looking for work, the number of unemployed becomes 2 persons, (12 - 10 = 2).

Answer:
Interest expense accured = $121.33 (
Explanation:
The exact number of days from July 2 through December 31, 2013 is 182 days.
The accrued interest (182/360) x $4,000 x 6% = $121.33
The pattern that is being referred to above is called the NARRATIVE PATTERN. If a speech contains a story or a series of short stories in it, and only includes a vivid imagery, the setting, plot and characters, then this would fall in the narrative pattern. Narrative means to narrate or to tell something according to the other of when it happened.
Answer: True
Explanation: Under the single recovery principle if the plaintiff, that is, the person bringing up the case to the court, proves that he or she is eligible for any recovery for a particular harm then that recovery should be made and settled in once and for all by getting a lump sum amount from the payer.
Under this rule the plaintiff can not claim reward for same injury from two different entities.