I believe it's A. <span>Eva would have been better off selecting the 20-year term policy.
Unde current circumtances, 10-year term policy wouldn't guarantee thesafety of the kids because even after the policy ends, Eva's kids still haven't entered the age where they could find their own income (they would be 12, 13, and 15).
If Eva decided to add another 10 year despite the extra charge, The kids will be covered until they enter the productive age.</span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Subtract both sides from 35
Simplify:
Factor 
=0
Your answer will be z=57
and No solution
Answer:
A I think im fairly certain
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: the answers is a
Step-by-step explanation:
