A.) head-on.
rear-ending cars are going the same direction as you, so they don't hit as hard.
trees aren't part of multi-vehicle crashes (hopefully)
Answer:
The president of Riggs has missed something.
She should make the Sail instead of buying because its cheaper to manufacture than purchasing it outside.
Explanation:
<u>Cost of Manufacturing the Sails:</u>
Direct materials $93
Direct Labor $83
Total $173
The president of Riggs has included the $90 overhead based on $78,000 of annual fixed overhead that is allocated using normal capacity in the cost of manufacturing the sail which is incorrect.
Riggs Company is operating at 80 % of full capacity, hence utelizing the 20% excess capacity would not expand its fixed costs.
Thus said the current fixed cost are irrelevent for this decison and would be incurred whether or not Riggs Company utilizes the excess capacity
<u>Conclusion:</u>
The cost of making the sail is $173 which is lower than the cost of buying them at $ 258.
I would advise The president of Riggs to make the sail by utilizing the excess capacity since its cheaper than purchasing it outside.
Answer: $13125
Explanation:
The amount that the insurer will pay to settle this loss will be calculated thus:
= Insured claim × Insurance value / 80% of replacement value
= 15000 × 105,000 /80% × 150000.
= 15000 × 105,000 / 120000
= 13125
Therefore, the insurer will pay $13125
Answer:
The statement is: True.
Explanation:
If we have been given an assignment, it is important to set a schedule of activities to ensure that the final form of our work is delivered on or before the <em>due date</em>, if possible. In the way, there could be problems of various types -for example, technology when delivering a report- that could interrupt our work. Therefore, it is important to consider those risks while scheduling so that we have a contingency plan that will not impact our research and the date we will deliver it.
Answer:
19%
Explanation:
Given that,
Nominal GDP in 2010 = $200 billion
Nominal GDP in 2009 = $180 billion
GDP deflator in 2010 = 125
GDP deflator in 2009 = 105
Percentage change in prices:
= Percentage change in GDP deflator
= (Change in GDP deflator ÷ GDP deflator in 2009) × 100
= [(125 - 105) ÷ 105] × 100
= (20 ÷ 105) × 100
= 0.19 × 100
= 19%
Therefore, the prices increases by 19%.
