Answer:
a.Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
A country has a comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries.
A person has an absolute advantage in production if it produces more quantities of the good when compared with other countries.
Georgeland produces more quantities of both food and clothes when compared to Alland, so it has absolute advantage in both activities .
The opportunity cost of georgeland in producing clothes = 36 / 18=2
The opportunity cost of georgeland producing food = 18 / 36 = 0.5
For Alland,
the opportunity cost of producing clothes = 32 / 16= 2
the opportunity cost of producing food = 16 / 32 = 0.5
Neither countries don't have a comparative advantage in the production of either clothes of food bedside they have the same opportunity costs in both activities.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
1. $46,550
2. $405,000
3. $450,600
Explanation:
1. Computation of differential cost regarding the decision to buy the model 200
Differential cost = Cost of a new model 300 - Cost of a new model 200
Differential cost = $396,350 - $349,800
Differential cost = $46,550
So, the differential cost regarding decision to buy model 200 is $46,550.
2. Sunk costs are the costs which are already incurred by the entity in the past and which are not relevant to decision made today. In this case, sunk cost is the cost of the machine purchased seven years ago for $405,000.
3. Opportunity cost is the profit forgone by chosen alternative course of action. In this case, the Opportunity cost regarding the decision to invest in the model 200 machine is $450,600.
Answer:
<h2>1) The answer is option a) or True.</h2><h2>2) Generally all contracts are assumed to be <u>Shipment </u> contracts if nothing to the contrary is stated in the contract.</h2><h2>3) The seller is required to deliver the goods to a particular destination in a destination contract,usually directly to the <u>buyer</u>
<u>.</u></h2><h2>4) The answer is option a) or True.</h2><h2 />
Explanation:
- A shipment contract mandates that the seller of any good or service is obligated to deliver the specified shipment to a common carrier for delivery to the buyer but not directly to the buyer's destination.Under the shipment contracts,the seller is not responsible for the condition of the shipment or package during the delivery point and time to the buyer.
- If nothing is specifically mentioned in the contract regarding the delivery of the shipment,it assumably qualifies as a shipment contract and the seller is only liable to dispatch the shipment to the transportation carrier and not obligated to send it directly to the buyer's destination.
- Under a destination contract,the seller is officially obligated to dispatch the concerned goods or shipment directly to the buyer's actual destination.Hence,the seller's obligation is incomplete until the shipment subsequently reaches the buyer's destination.
- For destination contract,at the point of delivery,the burden of risk and title associated with the condition and ownership of the specified shipment is passed onto the buyer and seller is not officially or legally liable regarding the same.
Getting Maximum Results with Minimum Efforts.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": negligence per se.
Explanation:
Negligence per se is a concept of the United States law that finds an act to be reckless because it violates a statute. To prove negligence per se, the victim will usually show that the defendant violated the law, the act caused the kind of damage that the statute was intended to prevent, and he was a member of the protected class of the statute.
