If in fact, the salesperson did knowingly and willingly, after being asked to sell you a "model...that is safe to charge indoors", sold you a hoverboard which
catches afire while it is being charged
inside a building of some kind, to my knowledge, this most assuredly does breach the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, the aforementioned being upheld due to the fact that the product in question was only purchased because the buyer expressed a need for safety indoors to which, it was then "IMPLIED" by the aforementioned salesperson that this peice of merchandise was that which the customer was seeking. "Judgement for the plaintiff in the form of punitive damages and restitution in the amount of such and such, and so on and so forth, etc., etc..." Case Closed!!!
Answer:
The after-tax MARR is 13.26%
Explanation:
After - tax MARR = Before tax MARR*(1 - tax rate)
= 17%*(1 - 22%)
= 13.26%
Therefore, The after-tax MARR is 13.26%
The inconsistency is that the decision ultimately ruled that the court did not have jurisdiction to hear the case. <span>Marshall's opinion assumes the Constitution was written in the past tense, whereas it was actually written in the present perfect tense. This results in an internal inconsistency in Marshall's opinion with respect to what the Constitution specifically provides. </span>
Answer:
12%
Explanation:
Calculation for the division's return on investment
Using this formula
Return On Investment = Operating income /Average total assets
Let plug in the formula
Return on investment= $636,000/$5,300,000
Return on investment= 0.12*100
Return on investment=12%
Therefore the division's return on investment will be $12%
they could give out less homework
give out weekly packets instead of a lot of daily work
only do necessary work
do more work in class
give homework every 2 weeks
or stop giving homework all together
