5 is to 7 as is to 49 is to 51
Ouch, kinda crippled w/o answer choices.
But with my calculating, i've made it out to be <span>92.07 %
Please do respond & rate based on my accuracy.
-Feeling confident-
</span>
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to get the inverse of equation, we will interchange the variables and solve for x and y as follows.
whereas, 
or x = 
Now, on interchanging the variable we will get the equation as follows.
y = 
Answer:
200-20=180
Step-by-step explanation:
