Answer:
D) Catering to entrepreneurs
Explanation:
Catering to entrepreneurship is a business practice carried out by corporations that generally seek to purchase start ups for the new technologies that they developed (including patents) rather than for their business model or profits. E.g. [email protected] paid $2 billion for Oculus, and Google acquired Nest for $3.2 billion. None of these companies actually made any money, but the innovations that they develop may generate a lot of money if they are backed up by a major player.
In this case, catering for entrepreneurs is a similar concept applied within an organization that tries to foster innovations.
1.tracking your spending 2.avoiding impulse purchases 3.using credit cards infrequently
Answer:
The level of saving = $450 billion - $400 billion= $50 billion
Marginal propensity to save = 1- marginal propensity to consume (MPC)=0.5
Expected consumption
MPC= change in Consumption/ change in income 200 billion * 0.5 = $100billion
Therefore consumption = 100 billion + 400 billion = $500 billion
Saving = $650 billion - $500 billion= $ 150 billion
Explanation:
Solution:
Let's start by assuming that the taxi ride demand is extremely elastic, to the extent that it is vertically sluggish! If the cabbies raise the fair price by 10% from 10.00 per mile to 11.00 per kilometre, the number of riders remains 20.
Total income before fair growth= 20* 10= 200.
Total income following fair growth = 11* 20= 220.
A 10% increase in the fare therefore leads to a 10% increase in the driver's revenue.
Therefore, the assumption in this situation is that the cab drivers think the taxi driving requirement is highly inelastic.
The demand curve facing the drivers of the cab is still inelastic, but not vertically bent.
When the rate increased from 10% to 11, riders declined from 20% to 19%
Total revenue before fair growth is 20* 10= 200
The gap between revenue and fair growth is 19* 11= 209
This means that a realistic 10% raise doesn't result in a 10% boost on income Because the market curve for taxi rides is not 100% inelastic, but rather low inelastic, so that a fair increase (control) allows consumers to lose their incomes.