According to the War Powers Act, the President is required to inform Congress of any military operations he plans to take within 48 hours. If the United States is attacked or seriously threatened, the President may use military action abroad with the approval of Congress and under the authority of the War Powers Act. If the President fails to inform Congress within 48 hours and get permission, the decision might be challenged and overturned. In my capacity as a judge, I must inquire of the President as to why he chose not to inform Congress of his decision.
Good questions to ask are
- How strict is the standard of review on appeal, and what does it indicate for the scope of this court's review?
- Where do you excel the most? When there are two or more viable bases for a ruling, which one do you hope the court will choose, and why?
- What specific remedy are you seeking, and on what basis does the court have the power to award it?
<h3>What is oral arguments?</h3>
Generally, In a court of law, a case may be presented via oral argument.
In conclusion, For this case congress is correct.
Read more about oral arguments
brainly.com/question/15266611
#SPJ1
Answer:
This morning our commanding officer told us that today we were going to have to charge German lines. Last week when we met their line we suffered heavy casualties. The current officer we have now is considerably young. I am worried that today we will suffer again. We have constantly been on the edge of running out of supplies. No matter, I will continue to fight in hope of bringing this war to an end.
---After the charge on the trenches--
We were able to take the German trench. Though it seems to be abandoned of supplies. The fight was surprisingly short. We called in a artillery barrage that crippled two of their machine gun nest. I hope the future fights prove to be the easy. It does seem that the Germans have lost their morale or just don't have enough supplies to fighting.
Explanation:
: )
Dictatorship is a form of government where political authority is monopolized by a person or political entity, and exercised through various mechanisms to ensure the entity's power remains strong
