WILL MARK BRANLIEST + 11 POINTS!

Social Studies

2 answers:

gizmo_the_mogwai [7]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The answer is the first: Similar fossil records provided evidence for a supercontinent.

Explanation:

Two fossils in particular served as good evidence for the idea that the continents once joined, but have since been separated: glossopteris and mesosaurus. glossopteris is a seed plant that appeared suddenly during the Permian period and spread rapidly throughout Gondwana, the landmass that later became South America, Australia, Africa, and Antarctica. Glossopteris experienced a relatively rapid extinction at the end of the Triassic period. The wide distribution of glossopteris on different continents at the same point in the fossil record supported the idea that these now separate continents were once joined. Mesosaurus fossils, a marine reptile older than dinosaurs, are also found in South America and South Africa, and provide additional evidence for earlier land connections.

I hope I have helped, you can put that is the most intelligent answer please.

IrinaK [193]2 years ago

6 0

Anwser is 2 because evidence that hit a metor hit earth

You might be interested in

The failure to master or progress in accomplishing developmental milestones is referred to as a(n)____.?

ExtremeBDS [4]

Adaptational failure.
Definition:
Adaptational failure refers to the Failure to master or progress in accomplishing developmental milestones.

5 0

2 years ago

During the Second Industrial Revolution, which system of production dominated in factories?

Brut [27]

Answer: B.) a system in which products were made rapidly by machines

Explanation:

i just took the test

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In discussing personal and social barriers to success, the author of the Diversity Consciousness textbook discusses the role of

Elanso [62]

Answer:limited perception

Explanation:The courage to define yourself.We must not allow other people's limited perceptions to define us. It is hard to believe just how much time I have wasted worrying about how other people have seen me, what they have thought of me, what they have considered me to be, the value they have seen in me. I somehow grew up putting a great deal of value in other people's perceptions of who I am and what I am worth, even when those people really have not known much about me at all. Because of this tendency, I have made many of my decisions in life based on what I have thought other people would think about me and my decisions actions. I have rejected possible relationships because of what I thought other people would think about me if I went out with a certain girl. I have not pursued certain careers because of the judgments that I was sure other people would pass on my choice of professions. I have not pursued certain passions because I did not want people to think less of me. I have also lost an amazing number of opportunities in my life. And while I am not going to spend today regretting what I did or did not do yesterday, I know that my life could be much more fulfilling today if I had not worried so much about what others thought earlier in my life. I wanted to be the person that I thought others wanted to see, so that they would accept me more fully. But that acceptance would have been conditional, which is the worst type of acceptance that we can possibly pursue.

8 0

3 years ago

"raw political control that is the core of the obama health-care plan, and americans are seeing clearly for the first time how t

olganol [36]

Is there a question that goes with this?

6 0

2 years ago

How can you makr the negative effects of globalization into positive one?

Anika [276]

Answer:

The problem with economic globalization is that the economic benefits are not shared equally. Officers and shareholders of international corporations are in a position to get richer, while the poor get poorer. The plight of the poor might be lessened by welfare, but the bigger problem is the resulting insane wealth of international capitalists, which gives them more political power by financing politicians and buying media outlets to influence voters.

8 0

2 years ago