(12-6)/12 gives you the growth rate *over five years* (115%)
divide that by 5 and you get an average rate of 23% growth per year.
If we’re rounding, yes, that statement is correct. Otherwise, growth over five years doubled because there was a growth of 115% and year-over-year growth was 23%.
Answer:
The overview of the give scenario is described in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
- The distinction between Floor as well as Function Inspection was that these techniques are being used to eliminate and locate faulty materials until the identical happens in manufacturing. Quality is the key objective of both processes, where expectations are reviewed and evaluated to ensure that the operation is carried out correctly.
- The differences between the parties would be that the system in the Floor Inspection needs to be checked the content in the process mostly on the machine rather than at the beginning of manufacture to ensure that every device or floor is functioning correctly. This would be to ensure that the industrial automation expenses will not go out and then go hand in hand as well as the fault could've been readily identified.
- But from the other side, the Functional evaluation could have the primary purpose verified, which is something the brand is motivated to deliver. For example, an electric motor could've been verified if it has the correct performance and reliability. It doesn't inform us more about the difference throughout all sections, but somehow it provides everyone a wider understanding of both the happiness that comes from inspecting the very same item.
Answer: the correct answer is $70000
Explanation: the fair value of the shares given plus the fair value of the contingent consideration is the total amount paid by the buyer which is (20000 shares * $10 price per share) = $200000+$10000= $210000.
The gain of the transaction is registered as the net fair value of the acquiree that is $350000-$70000= $280000 less the sum paid by the Acquirer that is $280000-$210000= $70000.
The $15000 in direct acquisition costs are registered as period expenses and not relevant for the calculation of the gain of the transaction.
Answer:
The bank reconciliation statement is as shown below:
Amount in $
Balance per bank statement 33,650.00
Deposit in transit 9,150.00
Outstanding check (17,865.00)
Bank charges 80.00
Note collected (6,095.00)
Returned check (540.00)
Check drawn <u> (630.00)
</u>
Book balance <u> 17,750.00</u><u> </u>
Explanation:
Deposit in transit has been recorded in the books, thus the addition to the bank balance. Bank charges have been deducted from the bank balance but not in the cash book hence it is added back. Note collected is yet to be recognized in the books hence the deduction from the bank balance.
Amount recorded from the check returned is more than the actual by $540 hence the deduction. The check drawn has been over charged by the bank to the tune of $630 hence the deduction.
No answer choices......
In a mortgage, the amount of money borrowed is called the Loan principal, or just a loan.
