Answer:
A change in the meaning of an unambiguous provision in the contract
Explanation:
The main aim of the pleading the parol evidence rule is to ensure that a party is prevented from any introduction of evidence of oral agreements made before the contract was agreed or in the process of reducing the agreement to its final form for the purpose of altering the existing terms in the current contract. Hence Weaver pleading the parol evidence rule ensures that Ward does not introduce parol evidence as long as it relates to a change in any of the provisions in the contract.
Answer:
C. Good Funds Act
Explanation:
Good Funds Act are simply laws that are made to protect the money funding purchasing of mortgage and refinancing transactions are safe for disbursement at the time of closing.
This act is actually meant to safeguard all parties from discovering they have unfunded mortgage at closing.
Good fund law is also known as Residential closing fund distribution Act of 2005. And it could be found in Good Funds Law (TCA § 47-32-101)
Section: 47-32-105 – Disbursement of funds by settlement agent from escrow or settlement account
Clothilde brought her money to escrow at closing and was desperate for the sale to record immediately so she and her dog could move in..was an example of Good fund Act.
It was a place where England sent all of it's prisoners. The thing is the crimes varied from the extreme of murder and assault to the first offense of stealing an apple of loaf of bread but everyone was given the same punishment and treated in like. They were sent to work camps as indentured servants and had the chance to be pretty much slaves in exchange for their eventual freedom. There were men, women, and children, they were treated very badly in the beginning as there were virtually no laws. Later things changed. Australia was initial settled by "criminals" who were later freed and started better lives for themselves
<span>According to Gordon Allport, intergroup contact is likely to reduce prejudice when group members engage in competitive tasks. This theory makes sense, when people have to compete for something in their home life or work life, they tend to think of things being more fair when there is a competition held to achieve the winning. There is so many prejudice in the work environment now-a-days that it is hard to have employees understand why decisions are rightfully made. </span>
Wanna say by creating sink holes but Producing household waste could also cause it but I would go with the sink hole option
