Early modern philosophy in Europe and Great Britain is awash with discussions of the emotions: they figure not only in philosophical psychology and related fields, but also in theories of epistemic method, metaphysics, ethics, political theory and practical reasoning in general. Moreover, interest in the emotions links philosophy with work in other, sometimes unexpected areas, such as medicine, art, literature, and practical guides on everything from child-rearing to the treatment of subordinates. Because of the breadth of the topic, this article can offer only an overview, but perhaps it will be enough to give some idea how philosophically rich and challenging the conception of the emotions was in this period. Most attention will be devoted to the familiar figures of early modern philosophy and how they conceived of the emotions as valuable, even indispensable aspects of embodied human life, which were largely constitutive of the self and identity that matter to us practically.
A word of caution is in order: there is a plethora of source material, and this entry is offered as a survey for organizing that material. Alas, much worthy material must be excluded here. This article and its supplements are designed for readers browsing for specific information, as well as those hardy souls who may wish to read it straight through. The main document offers a thematic overview of early modern discussions of the emotions. Separate links lead to documents devoted to the pre-history of the topic, as well as to some of the most important individual figures in early modern philosophy. Hope this helps! Mark brainly please this took me a lot of time!
The statement that best describes French settlers' treatment of Native Americans would be that "A. French settlers ignored the local native population
<span>unless they interfered with the fur trade," since the French had relatively good relations with the Natives compared to the Spanish the British. </span>
Answer:
1. As a Private Citizen
You, as a citizen of the state can propose bills for the country. But in order for this suggestion to be successfully noticed, you must first pass it to a representative of the Congress or one of their staff because only a member of Congress can propose a bill.
2. As a ‘Lobbyist’
Not anyone can be a lobbyist, it is a term used for registered citizens that seek to change laws by petitions or requests. They try to influence laws and legislations that they feel are wrong. Lobbyists let the Congress know about the people’s need and tell them how one bill can help or hurt the people they represent.
3. As a member of Congress
Although only a member of Congress can propose a bill, it does not automatically pass. Before a bill becomes law, it will have to be voted by the House, approved by the Senate and finally by the President.
4. As the President
The President can also propose or suggest bills but it must still be voted upon by the Senate and Congress and only then will it become a law. The President does not have the power to directly make new bills.
Explanation:
1. Chief and Commander of Military
Answer: The battles of Lexington and Concord were the first clashes of the United States War of independence, which occurred on April 19th, 1775 in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, in the towns of Lexington, Concord, Lincoln, Arlington and Cambridge. These events marked a point of no return in the war between the kingdom of great Britain and the thirteen colonies in the context of British North America. Around 700 regular British army soldiers, under the command of Lt. Col. Francis Smith, proceeded to capture and destroy some military positions that were supporting the militia in Concord. Dr. Joseph Warren alerted the colonies of this, who had planned that movement weeks before and had saved both people and material objects. They also learned the exact plans of the British attack the night before April 20th.
