Answer:
$400 .Since inventory is valued at cost or market value(current replacement cost) whichever is lower .
Therefore value of inventory : $400*8=$3200
Explanation:
Answer:
Fixed overhead application rate
= <u>Budgeted fixed overhead</u>
Budgeted direct labour hours
= <u>$114,000</u>
60,000 hrs
= $1.90 per direct labour hour
Amount of overhead applied to job X387: $
Variable overhead $4.90 x 170 hours = 833
Fixed overhead $1.90 x 170 hours = 323
1,156
Explanation:
In this case, there is need to calculate the fixed overhead application rate based on direct labour hours by dividing the the budgeted fixed overhead by budgeted direct labour hours. Then, we will calculate the overhead applied to Job X387 by multiplying the fixed and variable application rate by actual direct labour hours of 170 hours.
Esmeralda's promise is not enforceable because society does not want gifts cheapened by making them legally enforceable because society does not want gifts cheapened by making them legally enforceable.
A legally enforceable contract means that you can keep the promise of the other party. If the other party fails or refuses to meet its obligations, the contract can be fulfilled in accordance with the law.
A non-enforceable contract or transaction is valid but not enforced by the court. Unenforceable is typically used in conflict with void (or void ab initio) and voidable. If the parties implement the agreement, it is valid, otherwise, the court will not enforce them.
Learn more about legally enforceable here:brainly.com/question/7306383
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. Jack cannot bring in the evidence of the oral agreement because of the Parol Evidence Rule.
Explanation:
The Parol Evidence rule is a rule in the Anglo-American common law that governs or determines the types or kinds of evidence that parties to a contract dispute can introduce when trying to determine the specific terms of a contract.
The rule also prevents introduction of further evidences by a party after a final written document or agreement has been reached. Things such as the content of oral discussions from earlier in the negotiation process, as evidence of a different intent as to the terms of the contract. The rule states that "extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary a written contract". The term " patrol" refers to "word of mouth" hence it is referred to oral pleadings in a court case.
Therefore from the question, Jack cannot bring in evidence of oral agreement into the court for evaluation because of Patrol Evidence Rule.
Answer:
"What clothing brands do you usually prefer?"
Explanation:
The retail salesman will infer if the customer likes expensive or cheap brands as this person is trained to know the difference in prices of all the brands that the branch sells.
