Kant believed in something he called the <em>categorical imperative. </em>A categorical imperative is a particular moral position that holds in all possible situations - an unshakable moral law, in other words. For imperatives like "do not kill," this seems reasonable, but for others, such as "do not lie," it gets a little hairier.
Imagine a scenario where a murderer comes to your door and asks if you've see your friend around. Moments before, your friend came to you telling you about the murderer, asking if they could hide at your house. Kant would say you're obligated not to lie, so your options are to either shut the door on the murderer (not a great idea) or give away your friend's hiding place (an even worse idea). You can see how a little white lie wouldn't hurt, and would in fact <em>prevent harm from happening</em>. If you were a sworn Kantian, it might play out badly for everyone involved.
To answer your question in light of that, Kantian ethics hold that certain moral standards are universal and impose a duty on <em>all </em>humans. Do not lie. Period.
Explanation:
the answer eould be George Washington
a person who opted for unconventional lifestyles, such as living in communes.
<h3>Why would someone choose to live in a commune?</h3>
- A group of individuals living together in a commune is referred to as communal life.
- In the sense of something shared, the words communal and commune are connected to the word common.
- Additionally, several experiments in communal living have claimed to be communist societies, which is a connection to communism.
<h3>What do residents of a commune do?</h3>
In nature, they sought spiritual freedom, and frequently, drugs would help them get there. Members of the communes would go on group trips in the beginning and experiment with acid and grass together.
<h3>How do communes generate revenue?</h3>
Before costs are incurred, communes that share income pool their funds. No matter how much or how little each member earns, it all goes into a pool that is used to pay the group's expenses.
learn more about commune here
<u>brainly.com/question/1349124</u>
#SPJ4
Answer:
National Interest Argument
Explanation:
National Interest Argument for protectionism is a term commonly used in socio-political or economic related matters, in which it is stated or believed that it is unwise or unsafe to import certain key products because if in the event, the nation becomes dependent on those key imported supplies, it could be vulnerable to a cutoff. For example, such as oil, ammunitions or for special materials or technologies that might have national security applications.
Hence, the right answer is NATIONAL INTEREST ARGUMENT.
