The Federal Aviation Administration has banned the presence of giant lizards on airplanes. Corina has a business training lizard
s for use in television and movies. Her star lizard, a massive iguana named Izzy, likes to have her own seat on the airplane. In order to promote her business, Corina has asked her home state of Montana to pass a law permitting giant lizards on airplanes. Would a Montana state law permitting giant lizards on airplanes be constitutional? a. No, because it would be an unreasonable "seizure" under the Fourth Amendment.
b. No, because of the supremacy clause.
c. Yes, because otherwise it would substantially interfere with business and the commerce clause protects travel between states.
d. Yes, because of the equal protection clause
e. Yes, but only if there was a rational basis for the law.
The federal aviation administration, which is considered as supreme governing body in cases such as these. The federal aviation administration imposes such laws and Thus, the state cannot change it accordingly based on their convenience.
If an expense is paid with cash the assets will decrease.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
As long as cash is termed as a current asset, its flowing out of the business would be considered as a decrease in the assets.
Though it is a conventional practice to pay for expenses in cash, it has to be taken into consideration that the assets of the business are decreasing with such payments done.
But as cash is a highly fluid asset, its inflow and outflow do not bother the business much.
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001 mains at detecting and punishing the activities of terrorists in and around the United States. The act emphasizes exploring and detecting terrorist acts and scrutinizing them to put an end to such activities. The sources financing such acts are also detected and brought to an end under this act.
