1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nalin [4]
3 years ago
10

What was one effect of the empire being divided into four khanates? O Merchants in the khanates greatly expanded trade O Warrior

s in the khanates overthrew the Great Khan. O The rulers of the khanates fought over who would rule. O One khanate quickly gained control over the other three​
History
2 answers:
adell [148]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The rulers of the khanates fought over who would rule

Mice21 [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The rulers of the khanates fought over who would rule

Explanation:

It is

You might be interested in
Which is a valid conclusion based on the study of the Holocaust? Military commanders cannot be held responsible for acts committ
Maurinko [17]
Savage acts can be committed by an advanced society regardless of time period.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the weeks following passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, a joyful calm, mixed with a great celebratory jubilee that include
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer:

The statement is false.

Explanation:

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a U.S. federal law designed to ensure the equal participation of minorities, especially African Americans, in US elections.

Specifically, it abolished discriminatory illiteracy tests for potential voters, banned Gerrymandering if it discriminated against minorities, centralized federal voter registration in areas where less than 50% of the population were registered voters, and gave the U.S. Department of Justice various control over the Electoral law in areas where African Americans make up more than five percent of the population.

The debates surrounding the Voting Rights Act coincide with the culmination of the civil rights movement and the Selma-to-Montgomery marches. Martin Luther King, the then leading African-American civil rights activist, already called for such a law at a meeting with President Lyndon B. Johnson in December 1964. The president was positive about the project, but King said that such a law could not be implemented politically so shortly after the Civil Rights Act to end segregation. Johnson, who was recently re-elected with an overwhelming majority, initially wanted to focus on other areas such as poverty reduction and health care in his Great Society social reform reform project. After the events in Selma, however, he changed his attitude and assured King that he wanted to enforce the electoral law as soon as possible.  

The House of Representatives passed the law on August 3, 1965 and the Senate on August 4. President Lyndon B. Johnson signed it on August 6 at a ceremony at the Capitol, which was attended by numerous African-American civil rights activists such as Martin Luther King.

5 0
3 years ago
In what principles did the government of providence differ from that of massachusetts
kaheart [24]
Providence was in agreement with the native americans and the people were promised religious freedom and separation of church and state. Another dissident who is anne hutchinson educated that worshippers to did not need the church or its ministers to understand the bible for them. Displaced from the colony with her family and a band of followers and escaped first to rhode island and after her husband died to new netherlands which later developed portion of new york where she died in a war with native americans. 
5 0
3 years ago
What was the point of brinkmanship
arlik [135]

The point was that it was negotiation for two parties, they would force interaction between eachother to get an advantage in the negotiation over the other.

Explanation:

Example: this was used as a policy in the US to coerce the Soviet Union into backing down militarily.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one factor that YOU think determines the amount of media coverage an attack gets?
lions [1.4K]
Location. terrorist attacks in western countries (U.K., U.S.) get far more coverage than attacks that occur in say, the Middle East or Africa.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Supreme Court case McCullouch v. Maryland ensured that?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following most directly resulted from the Neolithic revolution?
    5·2 answers
  • I will give you the brainliest if you answer these three questions right.
    15·2 answers
  • Which statement best summarizes how American families are changing?
    11·2 answers
  • The ideas of the social gospel movement led directly to
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following occurred first? a. the capture of Mexico City b. the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo c. the Compromise of 185
    14·1 answer
  • Number 18. A political club that existed at the beginning of the French Revolution.
    15·1 answer
  • Choose all of the events that took place in Europe following D-day
    9·2 answers
  • 10. Why did the founding fathers believe in religious freedom?
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the quote: "I am the state." Louis XIV<br><br>help me plz​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!