Hello. You forgot to put the quote. The quote is:
"A large income is the best recipe for happiness I ever heard of."—Jane Austen
Answer and Explanation:
We cannot consider a good income as the only reason to be happy, since happiness is something you cannot buy and money is a finite thing, which promotes fleeting happiness. However, we cannot disagree that income is one of the factors that profoundly influence people's happiness, even without being the main factor. This is because we are happy when our needs are met, although a good income cannot meet our emotional needs, it is the only factor capable of meeting our physical and economic needs. Without a good income, we will experience difficulties and will not be happy, since love, affection and companionship cannot meet the needs of food, home and many others.
The answer to this question is <span>Hedonistic calculous
An example of jeremy bentham's approach would be in the case of robbery.
Most members of the society see robbery as 'immorals' because they felt 'negative' results if that action happen to them, so they judge it as morally wrong. This sense of morality certainly wouldn't be applied in action that give 'positive result', such as working out for example</span>
The most likely reason was that Italy and Germany expected the Nationalist to be friendly to them, and that would give them an ally in Europe. Additionally, it was a chance to train their war strategies.
Answer:
Development projects may vary in size and orientation, but most of them share the common goal of helping people and benefiting society.
There are the large development projects financed by governments and institutions including the World Bank that focus on infrastructure and improvements in the education, health and justice systems.
International humanitarian organizations and national NGOs that support development activities ranging from the community organization, welfare support, health, education, small-financial loans and protection of the environment.
Thus we need development projects for a variety of reasons.
The difference in each beaker is 50
