Answer:a. reasoning from principle
Explanation:Catherine is drawing her reasoning from a principle which legally guides the sale of tobbaco to minors , so she moves from this general principle into making specific conclusion. She pays attention to this general principle and make statements to support that how reasoning from principle works .
Mexico, Hope that helps. :)
Answer:
a. the container itself contains contraband or evidence
Explanation:
Officer Franklin has stopped a car driven by Zola, because the officer observed the car weaving across two lanes of traffic. As the officer approaches the driver’s side of the car, she sees a female driver, with another female sitting in the front passenger seat, and a third female sitting behind the front passenger. On the back seat behind the driver, Officer Franklin sees a container, with part of a plastic baggie sticking out the side. There appears to be a white powdery substance in the baggie. She observes the driver and two passengers appear to be highly nervous, with dilated pupils, and speaking rapidly when the officer asks questions. Officer Franklin may search the container without a search warrant even though she lacks probable cause to search the car as a whole and only have probable cause to believe that: <u>the container itself contains contraband or evidence</u>
Answer:
Alzheimer's Disease
Explanation:
Alzheimer's Disease is a form of dementia. It is a disorder in which there is a constant decline or slows in the process of thinking. The person starts to forget about things, situations, and behaviors. Also, the person suffering from this is unable to live alone or to perform everyday activities. The most highlighting symptom of Alzheimer's Disease is memory loss. Memorizing things and organizing them are some of the difficulties that the person undergoes with.
Answer:
The investigator should discuss the pros and cons of both the investigational drugs and the drugs that are commercially available drug and then allow the subject so that he can decide whether to withdraw form the ongoing research to take the new drug.
Explanation:
When the 46-year man enrolled in the Phase III study of the drug. When the research was going on a new drug became available in the market in that case the investigators should discuss the benefits and the drawbacks of the investigational drug and the other drug that is commercially available then let the subject decide whether to keep on the research or not.
