The process of dissolving two organic molecules in a polymer and recombining the water molecules to create new monomers is known as hydrolysis.
<h3>What is hydrolysis?</h3>
The molecule is broken in a hydrolysis reaction involving an ester bond, such as the one between two amino acids in a protein. As a result, the water molecule (H₂O) splits into two groups: one that forms a hydroxyl (OH) group with the remaining hydrogen proton (H+) and another that transforms into a carboxylic acid.
Practically speaking, hydrolysis refers to the process of separating compounds when water is present.
Condensation, which is the process by which two molecules combine to produce one bigger molecule, can also be thought of as the opposite reaction to hydrolysis. The outcome of this reaction is that a water molecule is ejected by the larger molecule.
The three primary hydrolysis processes are
- Acid hydrolysis.
- Base hydrolysis.
To know more hydrolysis visit
brainly.com/question/11461355
#SPJ4
<em><u>limiting factor is generally energy availability while in low latitudes moisture is the limiting factor to growth.</u></em>
The answer is; B
This type of inhibitors does not bind the active site of the enzyme hence does not compete with the substrate (hence its name non-competitive inhibitors). They bind the enzyme at another site and change its conformation. The substrate may still be able to bind the active site but the efficiency of catalysis can be drastically reduced threatening life. This type of inhibition cannot be cured by increasing substrate levels.
Answer: What makes a marsupial, a marsupial? A discussion on the historical biogeography and biological evolution of marsupial mammals. Dr. Robert Voss is a professor at Richard Gilder Graduate School and the American Museum of Natural History. His primary research interests are the evolution of marsupials and the systematics and biogeography of other Neotropical mammals that inhabit moist-forest habitats in Amazonia and the Andes.
What anatomical characteristics distinguish marsupial mammals from placental?
Living marsupials and placentals can be distinguished by a number of anatomical features, including structural differences in their ear regions, teeth, postcranial skeletons, reproductive tracts, and brains. Most people think of pouches when they think about marsupials, but not all marsupials have pouches.
When did these two subclasses of mammals separate from their common ancestor? What do we know about that common ancestor?
The lineages that gave rise to living marsupials and placentals are recognizably distinct in the fossil record as far back as the Early Cretaceous (about 125 million years ago), so the most recent common ancestor of these groups must have lived even earlier. How much earlier is controversial, with some estimates suggesting a date of almost 150 million years (in the Late Jurassic). We don’t know anything about that ancestor for certain, but we assume that it was not unlike the earliest known marsupials and placentals: probably a small climbing (arboreal or semiarboreal) mammal, perhaps superficially resembling living opossums or tree shrews. Because the earliest known marsupial and placental fossils are from China, most paleontologists assume that their most recent common ancestor lived somewhere in eastern Asia.
What is convergent evolution and what are some examples of convergent evolution between marsupial and placental mammals?
Convergent evolution is the appearance of similar traits in distantly related lineages. Examples of convergent evolution between placentals and marsupials are the extinct Tasmanian “wolf” (a very wolflike marsupial), marsupial “moles” (living molelike marsupials that burrow in the sandy deserts of Australia), and kangaroo rats (North American rodents that hop on their hind legs like kangaroos).
Explanation:
