Answer:
contract s not acceptable
Explanation:
Given data:
worth of CCTV coverage contract = $ 80,000
Coverage Cost = $ 74,000
Interest rate = 8.5%
Present value of the CCTV coverage is PV
As we can see from above calculation that present value of receivable amount is less than current cost, hence the contract is not acceptable
<span>This is the idea of the developing world. In many of these countries, there is a low amount of industrial or technological development. These countries have a rather low standard of living and a higher poverty rate when compared to countries that have technological development and progress.</span>
Answer:
d) All current customers who up to a certain point in time have NOT bought in the jewelry category but did buy jewelry in the next time frame
Explanation:
Cross-sell opportunities are employed by online and in-person marketers with the aim of convincing buyers to chose another product from a product category that they are interested in. For example, if the customer bought a necklace, the site might suggest that users who bought a necklace also bought a pendant. The aim of this suggestion is to convince the consumer to purchase an item that might be useful to him judging from the products he just indicated interest in.
Therefore, a good cross-sell model will identify customers who bought jewelry but not from a particular jewelry category.
Answer:
Total value added to the GDP is $500,000.
Explanation:
Given that,
Automobile factory uses parts that are purchased from foreign countries = $100,000
Total cars produce = 30
Price of each car = $20,000
Total cars sold = 20
Left in inventory = 10
Therefore,
Addition to GDP:
= Total value of car produced - Imports(parts purchased from foreign countries)
= (Selling price of each car × Total cars produced) - $100,000
= ($20,000 × 30) - $100,000
= $600,000 - $100,000
= $500,000
Hence, total value added to the GDP is $500,000.
Dane and the other stockholders will lose their investments but nothing else. Because Dane and others are stockholders in this company, they will lose the money that they had invested in the company and they will no longer receive any dividend from the company again because the company has gone bankrupt. Dane and others are not liable for other debts that had been acquired by the company.
