1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Setler [38]
3 years ago
8

WILL GET BRAINLIEST!!!! I NEED IT BY TODAY!!! NO FAKE ANSWERS!!!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
jarptica [38.1K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

am sure its d please mark brainliest

You might be interested in
2. Find the LCM of the following numbers by division method. (a) 16 and 28 (b) 36 and 44 (c) 45 and 120 (d) 10, 15 and 30 (e) 52
kati45 [8]
<h2> Answer </h2>

(a):112

(b):396

(c):360

(d):30

(e):1664

(f):240

<h2 />

3 0
2 years ago
Write an indirect proof showing that the diagonals of a parallelogram intersect each other
____ [38]
Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove 
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261


Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other, 
OC≠OA 
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261

∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles, 
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles 
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram 
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
4 0
3 years ago
Help me help me help me help me ​
Nitella [24]

Answer:

1. 4/12, 3/9, 2/6, 5/15

2. 4/8, 8/16, 6/12

3. 2/8, 4/16, 3/12

4. 6/8, 9/12, 4/16

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm assuming your question is about all 4 problems shown so I'll explain how to solve all of them.

1. The question is asking you to find an equivalent fraction to 1/3. The easiest way to do this is to reduce all of the options given.

To reduce fractions, first determine if the numerator and denominator share any factors. If they do, divide both terms by the shared factors until you no longer get whole numbers.

Step 1: reduce answer choices

6/16 = 3/8 (done by dividing both terms by 2)

4/10 = 2/5 (divide both by 2)

3/8 = 3/8 (fully reduced)

2/5 = 2/5 (fully reduced)

4/12 = 1/3 (divide both by 4)

5/10 = 1/2 (divide both by 5)

1/2 = 1/2 (fully reduced)

3/9 = 1/3 (divide both by 3)

2/6 = 1/3 (divide both by 2)

5/15 = 1/3 (divide both by 5)

3/8 = 3/8 (fully reduced)

3/4 = 3/4 (fully reduced)

2. This question is solved the same way as question 1.

Step 1: reduce answer choices

2/5 = 2/5

6/9 = 2/3

4/8 = 1/2

3/9 = 1/3

8/16 = 1/2

8/10 = 4/5

7/12 = 7/12

6/12 = 1/2

3. This question is solved the same way as questions 1 and 2.

Step 1: reduce answer choices

3/8 = 3/8

2/8 = 1/4

4/9 = 4/9

2/7 = 2/7

4/16 = 1/4

10/14 = 5/7

6/9 = 2/3

3/12 = 1/4

4. This question is solved the same way as questions 1, 2, and 3.

Step 1: reduce answer choices

6/8 = 3/4

4/9 = 4/9

4/6 = 2/3

9/12 = 3/4

10/12 = 5/6

6/9 = 2/3

12/16 = 3/4

7/9 =7/9

7 0
2 years ago
In 1950 the number of retirees was approximately 150 per thousand people aged 20-64. In 1990 this number rose to approximately 2
serg [7]

Answer: 233 people per thousand

Step-by-step explanation:

Using extrapolation method,

if 150/k in 1950,

  200/k in 1990,

  275/k in 2020,

2003 lies in between 1990 and 2020. So, you extrapolate the values of 200/k and 275/k for the years respectively.

Therefore,  

(2003 - 1990)/(2020 - 2003) = (x - 200)/(275 - x)

Where x is the number of retirees per thousand for 2003

Making x the subject of relation in the above equation.

Cross multiply the equation above;

(2003 - 1990)(275-x) = (2020 - 2003)(x - 200)

13(275 - x) = 17(x-200)

3575 - 13x = 17x - 3400

Collect the like terms

3575+3400 = 17x + 13x

30x = 6975

x = 6975/30

x = 232.5

x = 233 people per thousand to the nearest integer

6 0
3 years ago
Your goal is to save $50. So far, you have saved $34. How much more money do you need to save? Write your answer as a rational n
belka [17]

Answer:

You need to save $16 more dollars.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you add 16 to 34 you get 50.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is 128 hundredths written as a decimal?
    15·1 answer
  • I need help ASAP!!!!!When bisecting an angle, three arcs are drawn. One is used to find points on the rays of the angle, and the
    7·1 answer
  • Round to the nearest cent or whole number as needed. The price of a candy bar is $0.82. If the tax rate is 8%, find the total co
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP- 25 points-what is the circumference of the circle. Diameter =9cm
    7·1 answer
  • What does -8x + y = 16 solve
    11·1 answer
  • Which is equivalent to One-fourth x? StartFraction 1 over 8 EndFraction x + StartFraction 1 over 8 EndFraction x StartFraction 1
    13·2 answers
  • Find the area of the parallelogram. If necessary, round to the nearest whole number.
    12·1 answer
  • Timothy bought 4 packages of cat food and 3 packages of dog food. Each package of cat food contained 7 cans, and each package of
    13·2 answers
  • 1--1/3(-3) + 4(1)+12=3(-3)
    5·2 answers
  • HELP! <br> On an 8 section spinner what is the propibility of spinning a number less then 6
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!