Struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands.
Further Explanation:
Worcester v. Georgia was the case of 1832 of the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Renounce the conviction of Worcester. Supreme Court also held that any land of America without the license by the state to be considered as unconstitutional. It built up doctrine of tribal sovereignty. The ruling laid out a strong relationship between the Indian nations and the USA. John Marshall said that the character of the USA government is federal. Indian states would not be given any authority in the American Indian affairs. Thus Georgia statute is unconstitutional. The ruling was given to avoid the political conflict of the court and the executive. The ruling had ordered for Worcester to be free and they complied to the order several months later. Later in 1833 the new governor Wilson Lumpkin gave the order to pardon Worcester if they stop their activities in the Cherokee. Worcester and Butler complied to the order and they both were set free. Worcester came to the Indian Territory when Cherokee removal was on trial in 1836. Worcester joined his ministry back and translated the bible backing to Cherokee. The first printing press was established in the USA that worked with Cherokee for publishing the newspaper. There are several treaties between the USA government and the Cherokee.
Learn more:
1. Compare and contrast lifestyle choices that positively affect physical fitness with those that negatively affect physical fitness.
<u>brainly.com/question/951060
</u>
2. Discuss why a physically active job does not guarantee better physical fitness.
<u>brainly.com/question/1617174
</u>
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia
Subject: Social Science
Keywords: Conviction, license, unconstitutional, American Indian affairs, political conflict, new governor, Wilson Lumpkin, first printing press.
Answer:
Option D
NGOs are not officially affiliated with any country's government
Explanation:
NGOs are non governmental organisations, They are most of the time, founded by private parties who are normal citizens of the country usually with the aim of solving a societal problem or contributing to the development of the society.
In terms of ownership structure, NGOs are as a matter of fact, owned by private individuals, and as their name implies, are not officially affiliated with the government of any country. They are usually charity organisations, which receive funds from free will donations, rather than sale of goods and services
A loose, subjective measure of how well off an individual or a society is, mainly in terms of want satisfaction through goods and services is known as: Standard of Living
<u>Explanation:</u>
The measurement of quality of life and the prosperity of materials that are utilized by an group of people in an area or in a particular demography refers to the standard of living. The propriety the individuals or population in a country is the general measure for the standard of living. The material prosperity of a country can be compared with that of the other country to value it economically.
The main thing that is focused in this measurement is the quantity of goods and services that are manufactured and made it to be sold to an individual, family, class or a country. GDP per capita is the unit for measuring this. It is the ratio of gross domestic product of a country to the population of a country.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
Among the choices the true statement is "<span>Judges are appointed at the federal level, and the system for selecting judges differs by state government."</span>
Answer: Option(b) is correct
Explanation:
Gerrymandering is the practice of manipulation or alteration done in political district boundaries for favoring a particular advantage to a party. It is an unjust way of providing advantage so that it can harm other party's votes and effort by wasting it .
Other options are incorrect because prevention of legislation,limiting of bill in Senate and providing extra electoral benefit to major party are not described as gerrymandering .Thus, the correct opinion is option(b)