Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
Killing a lot of people and causing the 9/11 attacks
False.
Empty chair technique is a method used in Gestalt therapy.
<h3>What is the empty chair technique?</h3>
It is a gestalt therapy technique where the client engages in an emotional dialogue with a part of themselves or a significant someone (such as a parent) who is pictured as sitting in an empty chair during the session. The client then switches places with the other and assumes that part or that other person. These days, the two-chair technique is another name for this method.
This simple method is intended to help you resolve any internal or interpersonal disagreement. It enables you to view the problem from a fresh angle and develop understanding of your thoughts, feelings, and actions.
Learn more about gestalt therapy here:
brainly.com/question/8004115
#SPJ4
Answer:
Abraham Lincoln believed that it was unlawful ( A) it was illegal)
Hope this Helps!!!
The correct answer among the choices listed above is option D. A political unit or body of people living within a specific territory under one federal government is defined as a state. It is composed of an executive, a bureaucracy, courts and other institutions.
