Answer:
im pretty sure C. 3(-64-8) + 25 will give you a positive value
It would be 9/8
Hope this helps!
Answer:
it's D
Step-by-step explanation:
pls give me da crown
Answer:
Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."
Step-by-step explanation:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.
Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.
However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".
The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.
![\dfrac\partial{\partial y}\left[e^{2y}-y\cos xy\right]=2e^{2y}-\cos xy+xy\sin xy](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%5Cpartial%7B%5Cpartial%20y%7D%5Cleft%5Be%5E%7B2y%7D-y%5Ccos%20xy%5Cright%5D%3D2e%5E%7B2y%7D-%5Ccos%20xy%2Bxy%5Csin%20xy)
![\dfrac\partial{\partial x}\left[2xe^{2y}-y\cos xy+2y\right]=2e^{2y}+y\sin xy](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%5Cpartial%7B%5Cpartial%20x%7D%5Cleft%5B2xe%5E%7B2y%7D-y%5Ccos%20xy%2B2y%5Cright%5D%3D2e%5E%7B2y%7D%2By%5Csin%20xy)
The partial derivatives are not equal, so the equation is not exact.
