1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irinina [24]
2 years ago
14

Please please help

Social Studies
1 answer:
elena55 [62]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

small bumps on paper for blind people to read

middle ear

Explanation:

No explanation

You might be interested in
1. Nazi secret police subinfeudation 2. Nazi government's killing of European Jews oligarchy 3. worldwide result of the stock ma
Paladinen [302]

1. A.

2. F.

3. B.

4. D.

5. C.

6. E.

3 0
3 years ago
Why did Britain tax the colonists and why did the colonists protest against these taxes?
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

1 = Furthermore, the French and Indian War had cost the British treasury £70,000,000 and doubled their national debt to £140,000,000.

2= However, during World War I the British Government was forced to borrow heavily in order to finance the war effort. ... During the Great Depression Britain ceased payments on these loans, but outstanding bonds such as the War Loan were finally paid off in 2015.

3= Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. They decided to require several kinds of taxes from the colonists to help pay for the French and Indian War. ... They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens.

4= The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was issued by King George III on October 7, 1763, following Great Britain's acquisition of French territory in North America after the end of the Seven Years' War.[1] It forbade all settlement west of a line drawn along the Appalachian Mountains, which was delineated as an Indian Reserve.[2] Exclusion from the vast region of Trans-Appalachia created discontent between Britain and colonial land speculators and potential settlers. The proclamation and access to western lands was one of the first significant areas of dispute between Britain and the colonies and would become a contributing factor leading to the American Revolution.[3]The Royal Proclamation of 1763, Library and Archives Canada A portion of eastern North America; the 1763 "proclamation line" is the border between the red and the pink areas. The Royal Proclamation continues to be of legal importance to First Nations in Canada. The 1763 proclamation line is similar to the Eastern Continental Divide's path running northwards from Georgia to the Pennsylvania–New York border and north-eastwards past the drainage divide on the St. Lawrence Divide from there northwards through New England.

5= On April 5, 1764, Parliament passed a modified version of the Sugar and Molasses Act (1733), which was about to expire. ... The Sugar Act reduced the rate of tax on molasses from six pence to three pence per gallon, while Grenville took measures that the duty be strictly enforced.

6= The Stamp Act of 1765 was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain which imposed a direct tax on the British colonies in America and required that many printed materials in the colonies be produced on stamped paper produced in London, carrying an embossed revenue stamp.

Repealed: 18 March 1766

Repealed by: Act Repealing the Stamp Act 1766

Royal assent: 22 March 1765

Relates to: Declaratory Act

Territorial extent: British America and the British West Indies

Citation: 5 George III, c. 12

Commencement: 1 November 1765

7= The Stamp Act was passed on March 22, 1765, leading to an uproar in the colonies over an issue that was to be a major cause of the Revolution: taxation without representation. Enacted in November 1765, the controversial act forced colonists to buy a British stamp for every official document they obtained.

8 .The committees of correspondence were shadow governments organized by the Patriot leaders of the Thirteen Colonies on the eve of the American Revolution. They coordinated responses to England and shared their plans; by 1773 they had emerged as shadow governments, superseding the colonial legislature and royal officials. The Maryland Committee of Correspondence was instrumental in setting up the First Continental Congress, which met in Philadelphia. These served an important role in the Revolution, by disseminating the colonial interpretation of British actions between the colonies and to foreign governments. The committees of correspondence rallied opposition on common causes and established plans for collective action, and so the group of committees was the beginning of what later became a formal political union among the colonies.

A total of about 7,000 to 8,000 Patriots served on these committees at the colonial and local levels, comprising most of the leadership in their communities—the Loyalists were excluded. The committees became the leaders of the American resistance to British actions, and largely determined the war effort at the state and local level. When Congress decided to boycott British products, the colonial and local committees took charge, examining merchant records and publishing the names of merchants who attempted to defy the boycott by importing British goods.

The committees promoted patriotism and home manufacturing, advising Americans to avoid luxuries, and lead a more simple life. The committees gradually extended their power over many aspects of American public life. They set up espionage networks to identify disloyal elements, displaced the royal officials, and helped topple the entire Imperial system in each colony. In late 1774 and early 1775, they supervised the elections of provincial conventions, which took over the actual operation of colonial government

7 0
2 years ago
Why did people criticize the French Nobility, the king Louis XVI and the clergy? 
stepan [7]
Because the French nobility, king Louis XVI and the clergy had one major thing in common. All of them enjoyed and lived a lavish lifestyle full of riches, good food, and different luxuries that the average citizen in France could not even imagine perhaps. This is also the reason why they were criticized most. 
5 0
3 years ago
nondemocratic regimesare best defined as political systems wherein: group of answer choices a small group of individuals exercis
elena-s [515]

Group of answer choices a small group of individuals exercises power but remains constitutionally responsible to the public non-democratic.

a small group of individuals exercises power over the state without being constitutionally responsible to the public

  • This section first explains why a more thorough typology is required rather than a simple binary classification before outlining various nondemocratic regime types. Although it does not attempt to assess the relative efficacy of each type of regime discussed—doing so would necessitate a book unto itself—it does conclude with a sobering reminder of the numerous atrocities done by nondemocratic regimes that should never be overlooked.
  • The goal of legitimization is to win the populace's active permission, compliance with the regime's regulations, passive obedience, toleration, or resignation. Legitimation presents at least two significant obstacles for the study of non-democratic regimes. The first criticism is that legitimation is only "window decoration." Accordingly, the autocracies' attempts to legitimize themselves lack substance since they are merely outward manifestations of the violence, coercion, or co-optation the regime is able to wield. Second, it is frequently asserted that the conceptual and methodological challenges involved in its analysis are insurmountable, even though it is widely acknowledged that legitimation is crucial to the continuation of non-democratic government. Understanding the goals, motivations, and consequences of non-democratic regimes makes these obstacles crucial to overcome Having stable legitimacy can shed light on several facets of autocratic rule.

To learn more about nondemocratic visit:brainly.com/question/474018

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
What finally led to the end of slavery in the United States?
kolezko [41]
D. The Civil War was a fight between Northern and Southern states due to each side clashing together on certain issues and one issue being slavery in the American society
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the BEST description of the difference between the Unionist and Secessionist viewpoints regarding secession
    5·2 answers
  • Pietro notices that when there are empty seats on the bus, nobody ever sits beside a stranger. However, when the bus is crowded,
    11·2 answers
  • A federal judge ruled that New York stop-and-frisk policy is a violation of which amendment​
    9·1 answer
  • I need help fast <br> I have an attachment
    10·1 answer
  • What were the three basic causes of colonial dissatisfaction?
    6·2 answers
  • The photograph below was taken in the United States during World War II:
    14·1 answer
  • Define rights responsibilities being a studend with the help of web?​
    12·1 answer
  • Slide sum addresses i be bored in this lock up jank <br> ill write hella ppl asap 100%
    9·2 answers
  • How did the compromise of 1850 increase sectionalism throughout the United states??
    9·1 answer
  • How and how well do you manage your study time and anticipate deadlines?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!