Answer: Critical listening
Explanation:
Critical listening is form of listening when a person listens to the content of a particular message so that he or she can make evaluation and make a judgement.
A critical listener listens carefully to the message, analyzes it, and evaluates what he or she heard. Since Jim wants to decide if he should become part-owner of an auto-shop with the other business owner talking to him, critical listening is the.best option.
Answer:
The desire for a new Constitution was borne out of some of the lapses of the Articles of Confederation which produced a weak central government. In 1787, representatives from 12 states from the existing 13 states in the United States converged to draft the new U.S Constitution. Several deliberations were made to form a better and stronger system of government. However, two alliances were formed at that time as a faction. One was the Federalists and the other was the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison. They wanted a sizable amount of representation in government among states based on their population.
During the process of ratifying the Constitution, the Federalists argued that the Bill of Rights need not be part of the Constitution. They believed that with the addition of the Bill of Rights, the rights of citizens would be affected negatively and less protected.
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, wanted the same representation in all states. This alliance was led by Patrick Henry. They argued for the Bill of Rights and was against every move to establish a new Constitution, on the ground that, the constitution will give more powers to the National government and this will be detrimental to the citizens' rights.
A compromise was agreed on and after much debate on the issues of the Bill of Rights, the Constitution was submitted to the Congress of Federation in 1787 and by 1788, it had been ratified by most states.
Answer:
The investigator should discuss the pros and cons of both the investigational drugs and the drugs that are commercially available drug and then allow the subject so that he can decide whether to withdraw form the ongoing research to take the new drug.
Explanation:
When the 46-year man enrolled in the Phase III study of the drug. When the research was going on a new drug became available in the market in that case the investigators should discuss the benefits and the drawbacks of the investigational drug and the other drug that is commercially available then let the subject decide whether to keep on the research or not.
