Answer:
As per Kristy Johnson's letter where she mentioned the clauses of the acceptance of offer, she clearly mentioned that she will consider a response only if it is in written form and is sent through US mail.
Now Judy did as per the clauses and sent her a written acceptance through US mail whereas Michael telephoned her and let her know of her acceptance. If Kristy is adamant on her terms that she clearly mentioned in her letter to both and will stick to her word, then technically, it is Judy's fair right on the Montana interests whereas Michaels telephone call will be discarded as it did not fulfill the terms.
<span>You cannot effectively make a contract for an illegal act, but there are activities within the black market structure that are likely legal — say delivering goods to a location, without reference to how they are later sold.</span>
I'm not sure what question 4 is. If you could add both the picture and the question, that would be great.
Answer-
False
Explanation-
They wouldn’t allow them to run together