Answer:Two Treatises of Government, major statement of the political philosophy of the English philosopher John Locke, published in 1689 but substantially composed some years before then.
The work may be considered a response to the political situation as it existed in England at the time of the exclusion controversy—the debate over whether a law could be passed to forbid (exclude) the succession of James, the Roman Catholic brother of King Charles II (reigned 1660–85), to the English throne—though its message was of much more lasting significance. Locke strongly supported exclusion. In the preface to the work, composed at a later date, he makes clear that the arguments of the two treatises are continuous and that the whole constitutes a justification of the Glorious Revolution, which deposed James (who reigned, as James II, from 1685 to 1688) and brought the Protestant William III and Mary II to the throne.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: Spatial intelligence
Spatial intelligence is the part of our intelligence that granted us with the ability to comprehend three dimensional objects. This would determine our ability to solve puzzles, pinpoint object location from different perspective, and ability to understand mechanical process.<span />
GDP is a way to calculate the economy or cash a country has, yet nowadays money is not something many focus on. The new generation has come to realize that many things are more important than money. Though the United States has the largest GDP, Sweden has been titled the "Happiest Country". There are many things other than money that can be measured, things that people might find more important. People no longer want to measure things by the money one might make. Because our world doesn't have to revolve around money, if we could focus on other things then we might become less self-centered and less greedy, as income portrays selfishness and greediness.
Answer:
I also don't know the same question and I'm searching this
Answer:
Ended up with way more people then the confederate. If Frassanito's claims are true, what do they suggest about Gardner's Gettysburg photographs? If Frassanito's claims are true that would mean that Gardner lied about probably most of his pictures he took at Gettysburg.
Explanation: