Answer:
The frustration-aggression hypothesis
Explanation:
The frustration-aggression hypothesis is a psychological social theory. It explains the origin of aggression from frustration. This hypothesis is used in scapegoat and hate crime. The frustration occurs when the source of the economy gets down. This hypothesis was developed by John Dollar ed at Yale University.
The aggression is always projected on small groups of people which is called the scapegoat. Frustration always leads to aggression in a person. Thus here in the above context when Sam interrupted Paul several times he got frustrated. At last, he turns his frustration into aggression. When Sam enters the room he threatens him for punching on his face and will beat him hard. This is the example of frustration-aggression theory.
Answer:
8.3C Describe how religion and virtue contributed to the growth of representative government in the American colonies. Religious freedom was a main cause for the establishment of the American colonies. Religious groups (Pilgrims, Puritans, Quakers, etc.) created communities that were self-governed.
Representatives to the federal government were elected by state legislatures and not by the people directly. During this period, the people were governed by their states, and thus the distance between them and their laws was not as large as it would later be under the U.S. Constitution.Representative governments are the cornerstone of democratic political systems because they allow citizens to decide who will speak and act on their behalf in the larger government.
The Colombian expedition otherwise known as the worlds fair
The Maya believed the gods controlled everything that happened on Earth. Because only priests knew the gods wishes, the priests held great power to Maya society. Maya civilization was a theocracy.
First-past-the-post voting
In this kind of election, the winner who gets most of votes wins the election. The first past the vote election system has an added advamtage of promoting stability. the winner often enters into a coalition with one of the competitors after the vote. However, it is agreed upon that the election leads to legitimacy concerns as the winner could be determined by a small part of the population, in case several competitors were involved.
