Answer:
.B. The amount of depreciation expense recognized in 2019 would be greater if Dinwiddie depreciates the car under the straight-line method than if the double declining balance method is used
Explanation:
The double-declining method recognizes higher depreciation amounts in the first years of an asset 's life. The method applies twice the rate of the straight-line method on a declining book value balances. In the latter years, the depreciation amount will be less because the book value will have declined considerably.
In this case, a useful life of six years attracts a straight-line depreciation rate of 16.6 % (1/6 x 100). the double-declining method will apply a rate of 33.2 %.
The straight-line method applies a constant rate throughout the use-life of an asset. The book value decreases at a constant rate, unlike in double -declining, where the book value decreases rapidly in the early years of the asset. 2019 will be the fourth year in this case. The fourth-year is in the latter stages of a six-year useful life.
This kind of reasoning is said to be DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
Deductive reasoning is the process of reasoning based on multiple premises that are generally believed to be true. Deductive reasoning usually moves from the general to the specific. For instance, in the question given above, Jason reasoned that if other products are sold at discounted prices, then the items that are newly available will also be sold at discounted prices.
Answer:
30
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Total utility consuming the 2 widgets = 240
Total utility consuming the 3 widgets = 270
So by considering the above information, the marginal utility of consuming the third widget is
= Total utility consuming the 3 widgets - Total utility consuming the 2 widgets
= 270 - 240
= 30
Basically we deduct the total utility consumes 2 widgets from the total utility consumes 3 widgets
Answer:
$33,540,000
Explanation:
initial investment:
- opportunity cost of land (resale price of land) = $10,700,000
- building cost of the facilities = $21,900,000
- other expenses related to the site (grading) = $940,000
- total $33,540,000
The purchase cost of the land is considered a sunk costs, since it is not relevant now. What is relevant is the price at which the land could be sold at the moment of starting the project.
