Answer:
b. Due process has not been followed by the employer.
Explanation:
In the workplace when there is a case that could lead to dismissal, it requires the employer to first of all carry out an investigation to determine what actually happened. The facts could differ from the claims made against her.
She should also be allowed to to explain herself, this could lead to get exonerating herself or disclosing relevant information the employer did not know.
Amber can take legal action against the employer for not following due process in firing her.
Answer:
C. manufacturing or processing-plant arrangement.
Explanation:
According to my research on the different types of relationships between companies and their manufacturers, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this relationship is known as a manufacturing or processing-plant arrangement. Which is basically (liked described in the question) when a franchiser provides the individual stores with the ingredients necessary to run the store.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The correct answer is C.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The Nelson Company's radio division currently is purchasing transistors from the Charlotte Co. for $3.50 each. The total number of transistors needed is 8,000 per month. Nelson Company's electronics division can produce the transistors for a cost of $4.00 each and they have plenty of capacity to manufacture the units. The $4 is made up of $3.25 in variable costs, and $0.75 in allocated fixed costs.
Because there is unused capacity, we will not have into account the fixed costs.
Unitary cost= $3.25
It is more convenient to produce in house. The indifference price is $3.50.
Xmax = -44545.45 / -363.63 = 122.50
^ are there any options or you have to type in the answer?
The agency's position is that Bob had already signed a contract, and that the contract included a placement fee due to the fact that Bob was able to find this job through the agency. On the other hand, the position that Bob would most likely argue is that he is a minor. As a minor, Bob is allowed to disaffirm his contract. Therefore, Bob is likely to win in this dispute.