True
Explanation:
Realistic job previews occur during the anticipatory stage of socialization during the recruitment process
1. Because they didn't use modern technology.
2.Because they gave the freedom of religion and they had their rights.
3.Well they separated them into millets.
4.had help of grand vizier and a council<span>-huge bureaucracy supervised the business of government, powerful military kept peace
Sharia governed some parts of empire
5.</span>centralized power & relied on strong military
I would say the central idea is a thank you to those who inspired, believed in and helped the author publish their new book. To pay homage means to "give respect to."
Hope this helps! :)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach the video or a link to it.
However, we can comment on the following based on our knowledge of the topic.
It is my understanding that narco-terrorism is a serious issue and a real threat to national security for the following reasons.
1.- We are talking about organized crime groups that have all the money to buy weapons, bodyguards, loyal followers, and paramilitary people.
2.- They are part of an international network of organized crime that operates in different countries, including the United States.
3.- These criminal organizations can corrupt the military, federal, and state governments in different countries. That is why they can operate in secrecy and their leaders are seldom identified or caught by the police.
That is why Pablo Escobar's The King of Cocaine,' arguably the most notorious narco-terrorist / drug lord of all time, and other people can operate lucrative criminal organizations exporting drugs, generating violence and corruption through the use of bribes, and corrupt entire governments in different countries.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Chief Justice John Marshall has an illustrious career that was filled with so many achievements. Some of his gigantic achievements include solidifying the Supreme Court as the absolute authority in interpreting the Constitution. This was made clear during Marbury vs Madison 1803 case.
Similarly, he also helped determine and establish the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to review state cases and any cases bothering on the constitution. This was in Cohens vs Virginia 1821.
