Answer:
A. doesn't lose any sales when it raises its price
Explanation:
- As monopoly is ruled by one set of prices and they are price makers thus even f the prices rise the price will be set above the marginal cost to maximize the profits. Thus a monopoly does not lose its market share as it acts as a single dominating factor in the supply and trade of the goods and services. And it stipulates the financial dealing through a single seller.
Answer:
a. Plan I is better is we drive 300 miles in a day.
b. 150 miles.
Explanation:
a. if mileage is 300 then rental charges will be,
Plan I : $36 + 17 cents * miles
$36 + 0.17 * 300 = $41.10.
Plan II : $24 + 25 cents * miles
$24 + 0.25 * 300 = $99.00
Plan I total cost for 300 miles is $41.10 whereas Plan II total cost for 300 miles is $99.00. Plan I is better plan and cost effective.
b. For mileage (m) calculation we will use equation;
Plan I = Plan II
$36 + 0.17m = $24 +0.25m
0.25m - 0.17m = $36 - $24
m = $12 / 0.08
m = 150 miles.
Answer:
option 14.92%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question;
Expected annual dividend to be paid = $0.65
Expected growth rate = 9.50%
Walter’s stock currently trades = $12.00 per share
Now,
Expected rate of return = 
+ Growth rate
or
Expected rate of return = 
+ 9.50%
or
Expected rate of return = ( 0.054167 × 100% ) + 9.50%
or
Expected rate of return = 5.4167% + 9.50%
or
Expected rate of return = 14.9167 ≈ 14.92%
Hence, the correct answer is option 14.92%
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
It is true that under the all-events test, in addition to specifying that all events to establish the liability must have occurred, the test also provides that the business must be able to determine the amount of the liability with reasonable accuracy
Under Sec. 461(h), a three-prongall-events test is met when
(1) all events have occurred that establish the fact of the liability;
(2) <u>the amount of the liability can be determined with reasonable accuracy</u>; and
(3) economic performance has occurred.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
As the utility function is concave in shape, so person is risk averse. Thus, he will not accept the gamvle.
The difference between utility at point A&C = 70 minus 65 = $5, is less than a the difference between A&B = 65 minus 55 = $10
<u>MCQ:
</u>
Answer is option a&d - risk averse people fear a lot for losing money, thus they overestimate the probability of loss
Since, shape of utility function is concave, hence the double derivative of utility with respect to wealth is negative, so utility falls at an decreasing rate , as wealth increases
