Answer:
This is a form of artificial monopoly.
Explanation:
In artificial monopoly a large firm exists with smaller firms in the same market. The large firm does not have a comparative advantage in production efficiency bit still drives the competition out of business.
Large firms use restrictive measures that prevents new form from entering the market. The other type of monopoly is the natural monopoly.
Having exclusive rights to open a MacDonald's in the Carribean where you can construct as many locations as you want is called artificial monopoly. The firm has successfully barred other firms from opening a MacDonald's in the Carribean.
<span>As a marketing student, I can deny that there is a narrow range of career options given the fact that marketing consists of digital marketing, traditional marketing, and most importantly, sales.
Sales is literally in EVERYTHING, regardless of whether or not you're actually selling something. In Daniel H. Pink's book, "To Sell is Human," he outlines that even nurses, doctors, and teachers utilize non-sales selling techniques to convince patients and students to deem the information they are telling them as important.
Additionally, you must consider the fact that you have to market yourself to even get a job. You need to understand what makes X, Y, and Z appealing. Marketing is extremely meaningful in everyone's lives.</span>
Answer:
3. No, due to unilateral mistake
Explanation:
Lacey and Cagney both had agreed to wok for 30 hours per week and the agreement is in written format since it is enforceable. Both of them are sharing 50% profits so both will have to share the duties equally. When Lacey makes an excuse and is working for 20 hours per week only Cagney can sues her and she is in a probability to win against her. Lacey should have informed Cagney about the vacation from school scenario before signing the contract.
This is a case of Food safety fraud by Penanut corporation of America and the culprits where sentenced to prison in Albany,Georgia
Explanation:
- In the above mentioned case the managers (c)who shipped the product knowing that it was contaminated where also punished .
- The managers where punished for their role in shipping the salmonella -positive peanut product,for falsifying the microbiological results.
- The evidence of the trial reflected that tainted food shipping led to a salmonella outbreak in 2009 with more than 700 reported cases of salmonella poisoning in 46 states.
