Answer:
This statement is True.
Explanation:
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is the successor of the <u><em>Accounting Principles Board</em></u> and was founded in 1973. Currently based in Norwalk - Conn, the FASB is responsible of establishing the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and, overall, is in charge of setting accounting and financial reporting standards for public and private companies, as well as non-profit organizations in the United States. The FASB is also currently working to establish worldwide acceptable standards together with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
If Daniel took the cash, he could be found guilty of the crime of embezzlement. Embezzlement is a specific type of theft. It is when someone was entrusted with someone else's property (like an employer) and they steal some/all for their personal benefit.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer: evoked set
Explanation:
In simple words, evoked set refers to the collection of brands that initially comes in the mind of the consumer when he or she is willing to buy a product in market. These are the brands that are of high significance to the customer and that individual customer completely trust such brand.
Every producer in the market wants to be in the evoked set of the consumer as there is a high probability that customer will choose to buy their willing commodity form such a set. However, positioning in evoked set cannot be marked quickly as it depends on various factors such as duration, quality and price etc.
Answer:
I believe that a form of universal income would be a better policy than the traditional directed government benefits or welfare.
Explanation:
This is because the idea of the universal income would be to replace the welfare programs, by giving people a reasonable amount of money so that they can decide by themselves in what utilities or amenities to spend that money.
Programs with poor incentives like food stamps, or inefficiently run public-programs, could be replaced by universal income without causing harm to ther beneficiaries, and possibly even generating more benefit.
Answer:
Bill has $25,000 at-risk and he can also deduct $25,000 from his income due to the losses associated with his rental activity.
Explanation:
At risk amounts are the money that investors can lose due to a bad business decision or performance. The maximum amount that an investor can deduct is equal to the at-risk amount that he/she has invested.
Bill's at-risk $25,000 are equal to the money he spent on house repairs.
