Explanation:
No, customer data and information collected by companies, especially e-business, are not an asset that should be reported in the financial statements, they are valuable for companies, especially digital ones, for greater understanding and definition of their target audience, through standards, tastes, personal characteristics, preferences, etc., in order to form a customer base for possible marketing communications, in addition to forming essential information for companies to develop better targeted and attractive marketing campaigns for their audience, the which benefits in the company's sales and market positioning.
<span>Those farmers in the
developing countries demand reduced subsidies because subsidized agricultural
products from United States lead to an abundance or surplus of global agriculture.
This surplus eventually leads to the prices in developing countries to lower, as
a result of which the developing country farmers have to suffer.</span>
Solution :
In the context, it is given Alex and J.J. both are applying for a job openings in a law firm at Chicago. Both of them got the job offer but J.J. got lower salary than Alex. The salaries are different for both J.J and Alex. Some of the possible explanations for the difference in salaries that may be related to some scenarios are :
- Alex went to higher tier law school ---- difference in education
- J.J. is reentering the workforce after two years away --- difference in experiences.
- Alex will be working with a notoriously difficult boss --- compensating differentials.
- Alex is a man and J.J. Is a woman --- economic discrimination.
Answer:
58.81% annual
or 3.93% monthly
Explanation:
Using a financial calculator, we can determine the internal rate of return of this investment. The initial outlay is -$110,000, and the 60 $4,800 cash flows follow. The IRR is 3.93 per month. In order to determine the effective annual rate, we can use the following formula:
effective annual rate = (1 + 3.93%)¹² - 1 = 58.81%
<span>Vinny might be able to force the completion of the project. If the two had a written agreement that has not been violated or made conditionally null, then Spud could be legally obligated to complete the project, dependent on the interpretation of the contract by the court.</span>
