Answer:
The present value for eliminating this cost will be of $1,130,434.78
Explanation:
we solve for the present value of a perpetual annuity as this cost goes forever unless we change into electronically afterwich; they disappear entirely.
Answer:
A) He should include specific, verifiable facts.
Explanation:
Mark is a senior editor and is editing work written by Bruno.
He will want to provide an objective feedback to Bruno on his work that will not discourage him from doing his best. But also effectively state all the errors in the work that needs correction.
The best way to do this will be by including specific verifiable facts.
This will give a neutral response and maintain a good work environment.
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Answer:
Forecasted sales: 25% maximum reduction.
Recommendations: try new ways to increase sales during the months left, or reduce its own cost.
Explanation:
- If sales usually increase between March 1 and June 30, and this period accounts for 50% of annual revenue, if revenue is proportional to sales, a reduction in sales will reduce revenues.
- Between March 1 and June 30 there are 4 months.
- If sales usually pick up in March and this year they were low until the beggining of May, it means that only 2 of the 4 most productive months were higly productive.
- If 50% of sales are concentrated in this 4 months, and this year 2 of the 4 months were not really productive, a maximum 25% of sales (and hence of revenues) may have lost.
- Therefore, revenues may lower by 25% this year.
- To avoid losses, it is advisable to try new ways to increase sales during the months left, that can consist on doing some advertisement and promotions (related to health care linked to exersice for example), that helps increasing sales in the months left, to compensate the looses of the 2 months. If sales cannot be increased, it is advisable to reduce cost to avoid further looses.
Answer:
As in her worthless note,Sandy has a zero adjusted basis. Her bad debt deduction is Nil according to Section 166 (b).
Section 166(g)(1) states that her capital loss realized on the deemed sale of this stoke is also nil because of zero adjusted basis in her worthless stock.
According to Reg. Sec.1.1366-2(a)(5) if all of her stock is disposed by an S corporation shareholder and loss carryforward attributable to the Section 1366 (d) basis. Limitaitons are permanently disaalowed.
Hence, her $7,400 ordinary loss carryforward can never be deducted by Sandy.
Sandy has no 2012 tax consequences from worthlessness of her Lindlee investments
