1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
otez555 [7]
3 years ago
8

Which of the following is true about the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court?

History
2 answers:
Serhud [2]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Lemur [1.5K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

D

Explanation:

The Chief Justice has more power than the associate justices.

You might be interested in
How was roman republic governed ?
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Roman Republic lasted from 509 BC to 27 BC. It started after the period of the Roman Kings and ended with the start of the Roman Empire. Here, Cameron Sweeney explains how government operated in the Roman Republic. It considers the Senate, the Assembly, the Quaestors, Aediles, and Praetors, the Consuls, and the Censors.

a 19th-century depiction of the Roman Senate by Cesare Maccari. The painting is called Cicero attacks Catiline .

a 19th-century depiction of the Roman Senate by Cesare Maccari. The painting is called Cicero attacks Catiline.

Rome. Surely the best-known empire in the history of mankind. Rome has left behind it a legacy of art, philosophy, literature, and architecture (and a horse Consul, but we will ignore that). People know of the writings of Seneca, or of the story of Aeneid, or even about the aqueducts and Coliseum. Whether it be when Caligula declared war on Neptune or the stories of Julius Caesar, people typically know quite a bit about Rome. But what many people don't know about is their government. The Romans have left a mold in which western civilizations have used in the formation of their government.

Social Divisions During the Republic

Up until Julius Caesar took hold of Rome in 49 BC, Rome was not ruled by an all-powerful individual, but by two elected Consuls. At that time, Rome was considered a Republic, and Rome was the closest it would ever be to a democracy.

The citizens of the Republic were broken up into three main social classes; the Patricians, Plebeians, and Slaves.

The patricians were usually the wealthiest and elite families of Rome. I emphasize families because Rome was a society where even the wealthiest plebeians weren't considered patricians, due to their “gens” or name. Patricians lived in grand villas and had slaves do their work for them. Due to their elite social class, they were allowed to vote and participate in government.

The plebeians were the lower class of Rome. Typically without wealth or slaves, the plebeian class usually had to work for a living (an utterly repulsiveidea, I know). It was not uncommon, however, for a wealthy plebeian to buy their way into the patrician class, if a certain patrician family was in dire need of funds. Regardless of this, Plebeians were still citizens of Rome and thus were also allowed to vote and participate in government.

The slave class of Rome, on the other hand, had no money, no land, and no freedoms. Although slaves, they had some rights and often would occupy important positions such as accountants or physicians. Nonetheless, they were not considered citizens of Rome and were not allowed the right to vote or participate in government.

The Senate

Throughout the history of Rome, the Senate played an important part in Roman politics and government. The Senate consisted of men aged 30 or older, and senators held their office for their entire life!  Senators would advise the Consuls, and even the Emperor later in Roman history, and would often discuss and vote on legislation.

What makes the Senate interesting is that it had no legislative power. That's right, the Senate had no power to create or destroy laws. This didn't make it powerless, as the Senate still held a significant influence over government and acted as a prime advisory body to the Consuls in the time of the Republic.

During the time of the Emperor the Senate naturally lost significant power. Even so, the Senate discussed domestic and foreign policy and supervised relations with foreign powers and governments. The Senate would direct the religious life of Rome and, most importantly, controlled state finances. The ability to control finance was an incredible tool for the Senate's disposal, as that gave them leverage when the Germanic tribes decided they wanted to give taking over Rome just one more try, and the Emperor needed additional funds to wage war.

Conclusion

The Roman Republic, and SPQR in general had been a civilization that stood the test of time, and ultimately existed for roughly 1800 years.The way they wrote, sculpted, and governed shaped, and continues to shape, the world we live in today. Their ability to govern, reform, and adapt to their growing environment is what ultimately allowed them to exist for almost two millennia, and prove themselves such a successful civilization.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act deepen the divided between North and South?
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

The Kansas-Nebraska Law was passed in 1854. This law had the objective of creating two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, which would define their acceptance or not of slavery through popular sovereignty, in which the people would vote by accepting it or not. This situation clearly violated what was established in the Missouri Compromise, since both territories were north of the 36º 30 'parallel, established by said commitment as the limit between the slave states and the free states.

This situation, which protected the possibility of popularly deciding on slavery, intensified the conflict between slavers and abolitionists, since both groups were allowed to take a direct part in the establishment or not of slavery in those territories. Thus, when thousands of representatives of both groups moved to Kansas to participate in the voting, a situation of confrontation and violence between the two was generated, which became known as Bleeding Kansas.

7 0
3 years ago
Please help me with this thanks.
sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

D is the answer

Explanation:

Please give me brainliest :)

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best describes the Trail of Tears of 1838?
liubo4ka [24]
I’m assuming it’s multiple choice but I can still help. The Trail of Tears was the removing and relocation of Native Americans from their native homelands in the southeastern United States to designated territories for Indians that were west of the Mississippi River.
5 0
3 years ago
Sancho Panza is the farmer who acts as Quixote's 1._______. When Quixote attacks a 2.______ in the passage, Panza him 3_______.
Olegator [25]
1. Squire
2.Windmill 
3.Continues to follow

Hope I helped you.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Czar of Russia wanted to see the Ottoman Empire crumble because a. he was interested in capturing the city of Casablanca in
    5·1 answer
  • Which situation best illustrates a violation of the rule of law?
    8·2 answers
  • - Which building cost the Athenians 30 million drachmas (billions of dollars) to make?
    9·1 answer
  • Which populist platform appears to have been most important to Lease?
    9·1 answer
  • Voting in municipal elections is an example of what citizenship activity ?
    6·1 answer
  • Definition: This is a type of organization that provides help and assistance to a group in need.
    8·2 answers
  • How did World War II affect the U.S. economy?
    5·1 answer
  • What do the pyramids reveal about Egyptian society?
    7·1 answer
  • What point is Roosevelt trying to make in this<br> speech?
    14·2 answers
  • Which phrase indicates that Lincoln believed the Battle of Gettysburg was part of a fight for democracy?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!