1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Delvig [45]
3 years ago
11

Question is

Biology
1 answer:
amid [387]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C. exocytosis

Explanation:

This term describes the process by which cells release substances from the cell.

Thenks and mark me brainliest :))

You might be interested in
What is a range of the lowest temperatures found at the top of the tropopause​
dlinn [17]

Answer:

62°F (17°C) to -60°F (-51°C) at the tropopause.

3 0
3 years ago
Weather conditions that are characteristic of a region or of a particular place over a long period of time. *
harkovskaia [24]
This is the definition of climate
6 0
3 years ago
What was the result of the development of antibiotics on the outcome of World War II?
Vanyuwa [196]
Penicillin was made to help soldiers
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
True or false: Theoretically, it is possible (but very difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while.
Debora [2.8K]

It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.

There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.

There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:

  • no mutation
  • random mating
  • no gene flow
  • infinite population size
  • and no selection (natural nor forced).

You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.

For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.

Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.

If you want to learn more, you can read:

brainly.com/question/19431143

7 0
3 years ago
Natural selection suggests that creatures with mutations disadvantageous to survival will not live to reproduce, yet there are e
schepotkina [342]

Answer: No

Explanation: It is beneficial if the animals that are disadvantageous doesn't reproduce so it doesn't discredit natural selection. The traits in which variation is occured are more suitable for organism to live and reproduce in the environment are preserved and are passed from generation to generation.

However, natural selection effects limited number of progeny.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help 30 points
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not an example of a plant defense against herbivory? A) nicotine B) cryptic coloration C) spines D) th
    7·1 answer
  • What is a dependent variable in biology?
    9·1 answer
  • Does cell which has chloroplast have to have mitochondria?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following observations best supports the conclusion that two animal species evolved from a common ancestor in recen
    12·2 answers
  • What is a abscisic acid​
    6·2 answers
  • The method animals use to attract mates to reproduce
    5·1 answer
  • How is a phenotype related to a trait?
    10·1 answer
  • True or false: Due to starvation, amino acids from muscle tissue are converted into glucose. This wastes muscle tissue and can l
    12·1 answer
  • What occurs when behavior is modified through a consumer-stimulus interaction without any effortful allocation of cognitive proc
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!