Three reasons why the other method is not better is because to use drawing program would mean you would need some sort of technology and electricity to use it and some places, like third world countries, do not have access to that, so most probably you would have to resort to paper. Also, drawing programs are based off the skills needed to create geometric figures with a straightedge and compass. And lastly, what if we had no more technology anymore? Then how would we use a drawing program? Drawing programs are only reliable when electricity is located.
SO THE ANSWER IS A hope it help :)
<h3>
Answer: 3.1691, 5.8, 5.802, 5.82</h3>
Explanation:
The smallest item is 3.1691 which is listed first. This is because 3 is smaller than 5.
Now to sort the values that start with 5.
Think of 5.82 as 5.820; think of 5.8 as 5.800
We can see that 820 is larger than 800, which means 5.820 is larger than 5.800; in short, 5.82 > 5.8
Through similar logic, we can see that 5.82 > 5.802 and it further means 5.82 is the largest item. The next largest is 5.802
The sub-list {5.802, 5.82, 5.8} sorts to {5.8, 5.802, 5.82}. These values are then written after the 3.1691 mentioned. This will produce the fully sorted list from smallest to largest.
Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation:
coordinates pair (2,11) does not go with the inequality
Answer:
The second number in an ordered pie of numbers that corresponds to a point on a coordinate system is the y<u>-value.</u>
