He or she is said to have possession—it because showing
discretion in the means of or using in handling property shows possession
because it is a way of showing control and means of behaving in a way of
preventing something to happen that is offensive.
Answer:
I can't answer the question there is no enough information
Explanation:
Answer: Predictive validity
Explanation: Predictive validity tests are tests that have a series of questions that help predict scores overall on certain measurements. By testing someone or a group of people on questions now, this data can be stored and used for future predictions.
Answer:
Beginning in 1907, Mohandas Gandhi and his followers staged non-violent protests and refused to follow an unjust law in South Africa. One result of Ghandi's methods was that:
D. <u>The South African government repealed a law discriminating against Indians</u>.
Explanation:
Mahatma Gandhi was able to witness firsthand, during his stay in South Africa, the discrimination suffered by the Indians by white people, who even once tried to lynch him, later, in 1906, <em>the South African government of Transvaal, in a fight against immigration of Asian origin, he issued a law that forced all Indians residing in his country to register through a census</em>, which, given the different forms of discrimination, <u>could mean a way to locate and attack them more easily</u>, Therefore Gandhi initiated a peaceful protest the following year that, although it caused from arrests to executions for the Indian people, <u>influenced the government to reverse the law</u>.
Miranda v. Arizona is the U.S. Supreme Court case that condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommunicado, or making promises that can't be kept.
The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling (1966) ruled that arrested persons have rights to self-discrimination and lawyers under the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional rights against defense counsel and self-incrimination before cross-examinating police.
the majority opinion by Earl Warren. Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment requires law enforcement authorities to advise suspects on their right to remain silent during police detention interrogations and to consult lawyers.
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona here: brainly.com/question/1307890
#SPJ4
