Answer:
No, it is not fair to let financial pressures determine how much we are willing to spend to promote justice and public safety.
Explanation:
No, it is not appropriate to let financial pressures ascertain how much we are willing to contribute to promoting justice and public security.
Spending on justice and public safety is an essential public expense, an expense that is needed to maintain the composition of our enlightened society. Let’s consider the example of a correctional institution. Such an institution works towards the restoration of offenders. These institutions have to struggle with unlawful justice bureaus for funding. They also have to struggle with social welfare divisions like education for funding.
Now correctional bureaus help in advancing justice and public safety. If funding is freed from the restraints of financial pressures then these bureaus will be necessary for supporting public security and supporting justice.
Thxx man can I have brainliest too
Answer:
all the above, you have to be hands on and be completly sure you want to do this also because there are a lot at risk and there alot of challenges
Explanation:
Answer:
This question is missing the Tom's marginal tax rate.
So, I assume it will be 35%
ATRR= 0.052; 8yrs: 187,514, 20yrs: 344,528
Explanation:
ATRR = (.08 x (1 - 0.35) = 0.052 ;
8yrs = $125,000 x (1.052)^8 = 187,514
20yrs = $125,000 x (1.052)^20 = 344,528
