Answer:
a) questionnaires
b) attitudes of student who had and who hadn't taken the course
c) difference in age group of students among whom questionnaire were distributed in both the groups.
d) restrict the age group in both the experimental groups.
Explanation:
The complete quetion is:
An investigator was interested in studying the effect of taking a course in child development upon attitudes toward childrearing. At the end of the semester, the researcher distributed a questionnaire to students who had taken the child development course. Questionnaires were also given to an equal number of students who had not taken the course. The students who had taken the child development course had different attitudes from the students who had not taken the course (cg., they had more positive response about having large families).
a) Identify the independent variable
b) Identify the dependent variable
c) identify confounding variable
d) propose a method to unconfound the experiment
a) questionnaires
b) attitudes of student who had and who hadn't taken the course
c) difference in age group of students among whom questionnaire were distributed in both the groups can lead to different understanding of questionnnaire and so affect the response towards the questions.
d) restrict the age group in both the experimental groups.
Confounding variables are variables that effect both the dependent and independent variable
The answer for this question is: <span>hippocampus
Hippocampus is a part of our brain that played a very crucial role to assist us in long-term memory storing.
So, if memory is not affected at all after receiving a certain a mount of brain damage, we can conclude that at least the damage is located in other part/are beside hippocampus.</span>
India is suddenly in the news for all the wrong reasons. It is now hitting the headlines as one of the most unequal countries in the world, whether one measures inequality on the basis of income or wealth.
So how unequal is India? As the economist Branko Milanovic says: “The question is simple, the answer is not.” Based on the new India Human Development Survey (IHDS), which provides data on income inequality for the first time, India scores a level of income equality lower than Russia, the United States, China and Brazil, and more egalitarian than only South Africa.
According to a report by the Johannesburg-based company New World Wealth, India is the second-most unequal country globally, with millionaires controlling 54% of its wealth. With a total individual wealth of $5,600 billion, it’s among the 10 richest countries in the world – and yet the average Indian is relatively poor.
Compare this with Japan, the most equal country in the world, where according to the report millionaires control only 22% of total wealth.
In India, the richest 1% own 53% of the country’s wealth, according to the latest data from Credit Suisse. The richest 5% own 68.6%, while the top 10% have 76.3%. At the other end of the pyramid, the poorer half jostles for a mere 4.1% of national wealth.
What’s more, things are getting better for the rich. The Credit Suisse data shows that India’s richest 1% owned just 36.8% of the country’s wealth in 2000, while the share of the top 10% was 65.9%. Since then they have steadily increased their share of the pie. The share of the top 1% now exceeds 50%.
This is far ahead of the United States, where the richest 1% own 37.3% of total wealth. But India’s finest still have a long way to go before they match Russia, where the top 1% own a stupendous 70.3% of the country’s wealth.
Answer: I believe it is A:abundance of large animals D:increase in vegetation and E:warmer global climate. :) brainliest?
