There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
The images associated with the headings.
Answer: Option A.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Road trips are the trips that the people choose to go from one place to another via roads. The people who have an adventurous nature, love to go on a road trip to far off locations from their houses.
Before going for a road trip, you should prepare yourself properly and should take all the things which are necessary for you on your trip. Even the author makes a proper document to prepare for the road trip and to make things even more clear repeats the images which has headings on it so that she is well prepared and does not forget anything.
Answer:
it is b
Explanation:
the word "golden" in the line is basically the meaning of beautiful
Answer:
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Explanation:
It is intransitive.
Here in the sentence, it doesn't require an object to complete its meaning
