1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nikolay [14]
3 years ago
15

1. Does art have to be beautiful? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
RUDIKE [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1.Works of art don't have to be beautiful, but we must acknowledge that aesthetic judgement plays a large part in the reception of art. Beauty might not be an objective quality in the work of art, nor is it a rational way for us to argue for the cultural importance of an object.

2.Two art- related careers is an art teacher, which will need to have the skills to teach visual art and an art consultant which would need to have skills to search for a specific art need of the business

You might be interested in
What did the rhineland ethiopia and austria have in common (points 3)
scoray [572]
<span>The answer is A. Rhineland and Austria were invaded by Hitler and Ethiopia was invaded by Mussolini. Ethiopia and Austria were part of the League of Nations but no one from their nations ever headed it.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would you describe the life in the court of suleiman the magnificent court
DochEvi [55]
The Europeans called him "The Magnificent," but the Ottomans called him Kanuni, or "The Lawgiver." The Suleymanie Mosque, built for Suleyman, describes Suleyman in its inscription as Nashiru kawanin al-Sultaniyye , or "Propagator of the Sultanic Laws." The primacy of Suleyman as a law-giver is at the foundation of his place in Islamic history and world view. It is perhaps important to step back a moment and closely examine this title to fully understand Suleyman's place in history.

The word used for law here, kanun, has a very specific reference. In Islamic tradition, the Shari'ah, or laws originally derived from the Qur'an , are meant to be universally applied across all Islamic states. No Islamic ruler has the power to overturn or replace these laws. So what laws was Suleyman "giving" to the Islamic world? What precisely does kanun refer to since it doesn't refer to the main body of Islamic law, the Shari'ah ?

The kanun refer to situational decisions that are not covered by the Shari'ah . Even though the Shari'ah provides all necessary laws, it's recognized that some situations fall outside their parameters. In Islamic tradition, if a case fell outside the parameters of the Shari'ah , then a judgement or rule in the case could be arrived at through analogy with rules or cases that are covered by the Shari'ah . This method of juridical thinking was only accepted by the most liberal school of Shari'ah , Hanifism, so it is no surprise that Hanifism dominated Ottoman law.

The Ottomans, however, elevated kanun into an entire code of laws independent of the Shari'ah. The first two centuries of Ottoman rule, from 1350 to 1550, saw an explosion of kanun rulings and laws, so that by the beginning of the sixteenth century, the kanun were a complete and independent set of laws that by and large were more important than the Shari'ah . This unique situation was brought about in part because of the unique heritage of the Ottomans. In both Turkish and Mongol traditions, the imperial law, or law pronounced by the monarch, was considered sacred. They even had a special word for it: the Turks called it Türe and the Mongols called it Yasa . In the system of Türe and Yasa , imperial law was regarded as the essential and sacred foundation of the empire. When this tradition collided with the Islamic Shari'ah tradition, a compromised system combining both was formed.

The Sultanic laws were first collected together by Mehmed the Conqueror. Mehmed divided the kanun into two separate sets or laws. The first set dealt with the organization of government and the military, and the second set dealt with the taxation and treatment of the peasantry. The latter group was added to after the death of Mehmed and the Ottoman kanun pretty much crystallized into its final form in 1501. Suleyman, for his part, revised the law code, but on the whole the Suleyman code of laws is pretty identical to the 1501 system of laws. However, it was under Suleyman that the laws took their final form; no more revisions were made after his reign. From this point onwards, this code of laws was called, kanun-i 'Osmani , or the "Ottoman laws."

Hope this helps
4 0
2 years ago
How did the ruling philosophies of stalin and mussolini differ?
DENIUS [597]
Stalin supported the philosophy of communism, while Mussolini supported the philosophy of fascism.
8 0
3 years ago
Why might one study world history by entire eras rather than by separate dates and events?
malfutka [58]
I'm pretty sure it would take way too long and they wouldn't have a pattern to grab information off of.
7 0
3 years ago
Who would
dangina [55]

Answer:

The one who would inherit future problems is Herbert Hoover

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Rasputin affect the relationship between the government and the people of Russia?
    14·2 answers
  • Was there was an abundace of laborers during colonial america
    11·1 answer
  • Which options accurately describe ancient Greece’s influence on later civilizations?
    9·1 answer
  • What political systems did the first settlers base their government upon?
    8·1 answer
  • Explain the sects or groups of the Islamic religion.
    14·1 answer
  • What were the main concerns of jerry Falwell and his followers in the moral majority
    8·1 answer
  • Why was William pen given land in the middle colonies
    15·2 answers
  • IBIGAY ANG KAHULUGAN NG PANGALAN,KABUHAYAN AT RELIHIYON NG MICRONESIAN
    11·1 answer
  • Which is a factor that contributes to the president's popularity?
    6·2 answers
  • What is a political culture?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!