Answer:
Explanation: those above him/ her can not serve
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer
could not be incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment
Explanation
Due process are the steps that the government must take to ensure that the rights are protected. In the constitution the steps to due process are the 4th amendment which protects people from unlawful searches and seizures which means that police have no right to search you without a warrant. then the 5th amendment which imposes restrictions on governments prosecution of persons accused of crimes. It prohibits self incrimination. The 6th amendment which guarantees rights of criminal defendants which includes the right to public trial without unnecessary delay. And the 8th amendment which states that Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. The due process could not be could not be incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment this is because the Fourteenth Amendment has had a profound impact on American jurisprudence.
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is option 2. The Kansas Nebraska act continued ideas of compromise of 1850. <span>The bill was reported to the main body of the Senate on January 4, 1854. The bill had been modified by Douglas, who had also authored the </span>New Mexico Territory<span> and </span>Utah Territory<span> acts, to mirror the language from the Compromise of 1850.</span>
I'm only 5 but i'll try to help
